Indonesia and Taiwan use their coastal geography to create their identities and policies. Indonesia’s strategic location between the Indian and Pacific Oceans, its archipelagic status and inheritance of two Southeast Asian thalassocracies inspired the development of its Global Maritime Fulcrum in 2014, Maritime Policies in 2017 and Maritime Diplomacy White Paper in 2019.
Meanwhile, Taiwan’s position at a junction between Northeast and Southeast Asia, facing the Pacific Ocean and surrounded by sea, has from the 2000s led to the development of an ocean state identity and policies.
In 2020, the Legislative Yuan passed the 2020 National Ocean Policy White Paper.
Social and cultural elements are crucial for Indonesia and Taiwan in building maritime identities because international law does not define these terms specifically. The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea only defines archipelagic countries and coastal states. As a result, historical narrative and cultural heritage are crucial for forming a national identity centered on the sea.
Historical narratives of regional sea powers, such as the kingdoms of Srivijaya and Majapahit, and the cultural heritage of the Orang Laut sea people, are important sources of Indonesian maritime identity.
Meanwhile, Taiwan derives marine culture from its indigenous communities.
Although the sea-related identities constructed by Taiwan and Indonesia are distinct, as maritime and ocean states, they both see the sea as a source of their identity and power.
They are motivated to adopt maritime policies out of an awareness of their nautical heritages and a desire to establish a strong maritime identity, recognizing that past neglect of the maritime domain has not served their national interests.
They construct a maritime vision based on a similar scenario and motivation. Indonesia aspires to be an advanced maritime country and leader through the Global Maritime Fulcrum. Meanwhile, Taiwan aims to be a sustainable marine nation.
Furthermore, Taiwan and Indonesia have comparable concerns about their maritime domains. Their marine policy documents focus on similar issues, such as maritime territorial security, safety and governance, marine environmental preservation, maritime economy and industry, maritime culture, and human resources.
They also take a similar approach to promoting open and rules-based relationships in the region. Indonesia and Taiwan constructively contribute to the Indo-Pacific region’s peace and prosperity.
A comparison of Indonesia and Taiwan’s sea-based identities and maritime policies reveals a significant potential for collaboration in marine concerns.
Since they have a similar understanding of the maritime sector and multiple associated programs covered by their maritime policies, they have a great chance to engage, collaborate and work together on maritime issues. At the very least, they could work together in three fields:
First, cooperation in the maritime industry. Indonesia is strategically located on important trade routes, whereas Taiwan has an advanced marine industry, with the world’s fourth-largest shipping firm and fourteenth-largest container port. They could collaborate to create maritime industries, port infrastructure and shipping technology through investment and trade.
Second, Indonesia and Taiwan could work together to establish secure and stable international maritime areas. As maritime countries, they face comparable challenges in combating transnational crime at sea, while promoting maritime safety.
Third, cooperation and collaboration in marine research and education. Jakarta and Taipei should prioritize educational and scientific partnerships in marine affairs.
The 2004 Memorandum of Understanding on Marine and Fisheries Cooperation between the two maritime states was a positive achievement, and since Taiwan introduced the New Southbound Policy in 2016, numerous Indonesian students have studied at Taiwanese universities.
Taiwan’s advanced technology and research in marine science and technology make it an excellent partner for Indonesia to strengthen its human resources in the fields of marine science and technology.
Taiwanese experts could engage with Indonesian researchers on larger marine science projects in Indonesia.
Moreover, studying and researching marine history and culture is critical for discovering social and cultural links between Indonesia and Taiwan, laying a solid foundation for increased maritime cooperation and collaboration.
In this regard, cooperation in education, research and innovation would help Indonesia and Taiwan connect their marine visions.
Hopefully, the new governments in both countries will seize this chance to strengthen their marine cooperation.
Tonny Dian Effendi is a doctoral candidate at National Sun Yat-sen University’s Institute for Political Science, and a doctoral student scholarship training awardee of Academia Sinica’s Center for Asia-Pacific Area Studies.
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has its chairperson election tomorrow. Although the party has long positioned itself as “China friendly,” the election is overshadowed by “an overwhelming wave of Chinese intervention.” The six candidates vying for the chair are former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), former lawmaker Cheng Li-wen (鄭麗文), Legislator Luo Chih-chiang (羅智強), Sun Yat-sen School president Chang Ya-chung (張亞中), former National Assembly representative Tsai Chih-hong (蔡志弘) and former Changhua County comissioner Zhuo Bo-yuan (卓伯源). While Cheng and Hau are front-runners in different surveys, Hau has complained of an online defamation campaign against him coming from accounts with foreign IP addresses,
Taiwan’s business-friendly environment and science parks designed to foster technology industries are the key elements of the nation’s winning chip formula, inspiring the US and other countries to try to replicate it. Representatives from US business groups — such as the Greater Phoenix Economic Council, and the Arizona-Taiwan Trade and Investment Office — in July visited the Hsinchu Science Park (新竹科學園區), home to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) headquarters and its first fab. They showed great interest in creating similar science parks, with aims to build an extensive semiconductor chain suitable for the US, with chip designing, packaging and manufacturing. The
RSS