A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance.
Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials.
That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath of the April 3 earthquake drew criticism that Fu, a legislator elected from Hualien County who is the county’s former commissioner, and other members of the group are neglecting their duties.
On the other hand, Fu displayed his arrogance by threatening Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers not to hold any voting while they are away, saying that the KMT, which has one seat more than the DPP in the Legislative Yuan, would retaliate.
In this legislative session that began in February, the KMT caucus has consistently been incompetent and arrogant. In one case, it violated the legislature’s procedures and called for an extraordinary meeting, only to call it an error later and blame a party staff member. There are many other instances, including KMT legislators reprimanding government officials and calling them “subordinates to legislators,” and earlier this month erroneously counting KMT Legislator Sasuyu Ruljuwan (盧縣一) in a vote on pension reform despite him being in China that day, which the party blamed on a Legislative Yuan worker; and proposing to amend laws restricting the allocation of special budgets, then proposing a draft act for the construction of an expressway connecting Hualien and Taitung, which is unconstitutional.
Moreover, the announced visit is happening just after former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) of the KMT met with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, where Xi said that “external interference cannot stop the historical trend of reunion of the country and family,” and Ma echoed him by saying people of the two sides of the Strait belong to the Chinese nation.
The visit is also on the eve of president-elect William Lai (賴清德) of the DPP taking office on May 20 and at a time when Beijing is intensifying its pressure on Taiwan through multifaceted tools of coercion to demonstrate its disapproval of Lai, who it calls a “troublemaker” and a “separatist.”
Considering there is no urgent agenda and that it is taking place at a sensitive time, the purpose of the visit is questionable.
Fu and the KMT legislators’ visit seems to serve the same purpose as Ma’s, which served China’s interests by helping it signal to the world that Beijing can be friendly and have peaceful dialogue with Taiwan if the nation accepts the “one China” principle. It would also help the party convey the message to Taiwanese that only the KMT is capable of bringing peace and prosperity across the Taiwan Strait.
KMT Vice Chairman Andrew Hsia (夏立言) has visited China eight times since he took the post in 2021, and the media have reported that Beijing has invited the party’s other high-ranking officials and Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to visit this year. Whether KMT politicians’ visits to China are really in Taiwan’s interest, or simply serve Beijing by helping it send the “one China” message to the world, needs to be scrutinized.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS