Quake starts virtuous cycle
At 7.58am on April 3, Taiwan was struck by an earthquake measuring 7.2 on the Richter scale, the strongest quake to hit Taiwan since the 921 Earthquake of September 1999.
This month’s quake caused serious damage in many places, with Hualien County being the hardest hit.
Search and rescue teams from home and abroad, and emergency personnel threw themselves into their tasks so that people trapped by the earthquake could reach safety, and communications and people’s lives could return to normal as soon as possible. Many tales of heroism were reported, but there were no major disasters and most people’s lives were hardly affected.
Japanese observers were amazed by the cubicle tents that the Buddhist Compassion Relief Tzu Chi Foundation set up for disaster victims in reception centers, providing privacy and shelter. Some Japanese Internet users lamented that Japan had been outdone by the thoughtfulness of Taiwanese, but actually Japan has also done very well in the field of disaster response.
Taiwan and Japan are both island nations in earthquake regions. If a country is prone to disasters, it can prompt the state to establish comprehensive building regulations, while the public learns lessons, gains experience and grows wiser.
An American reporter remarked that it was hard to imagine how many people would be killed and injured if a magnitude 7.2 earthquake hit the US and how long it would take to get back to normal.
Social resilience depends on experience. Since the 921 Earthquake, Taiwan has comprehensively improved its architectural safety standards, This helped to mitigate this latest disaster.
The same is true of Taiwan’s production of electronic chips, which is of great concern to the world. Although some production lines in the factories of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co had to be shut down immediately following the quake, more than 70 percent of them were back in operation after 10 hours and 80 percent were up and running by the following day.
Every disaster is a test of the government and public. At the time of the 921 Earthquake, the international community was worried that there would be a shortage of silicon wafers, but supply returned to normal after just a month. The recovery following this month’s earthquake has been even faster, partly because there was hardly any interruption to water and electricity supplies.
Since the recent earthquake, Taiwan’s ruling and opposition parties have formed a firmer consensus on replacing aging buildings. Especially when it comes to home owners who were previously unwilling to undergo urban renewal, this earthquake has reminded them that danger is ever present.
This might explain why Taiwan’s benchmark stock index climbed nearly 400 points on April 9, and why stocks that rose were not only those of high-end chip and other technologies, but also those of construction companies.
Events following the Hualien earthquake have also revealed a virtuous cycle in international exchanges and interactions. Following Japan’s Tohoku earthquake and tsunami in March 2011 and the one that struck Noto Peninsula in Ishikawa Prefecture on Jan. 1, many Japanese were moved by the generous assistance offered by Taiwan’s government and opposition parties.
Looking back 25 years to the 921 Earthquake, the first foreign rescue team to arrive in Taiwan came from Turkey. In February last year, Taiwan sent a search and rescue team to help Turkey after it was hit by a devastating earthquake, and Turkish media reported the team’s work widely and gratefully before it returned to Taiwan.
Such examples of mutual aid and cooperation have repeatedly shown the humanitarian spirit and friendship that exists in the international community.
Lee Shang
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS