On Saturday last week, vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴), Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chen Kuan-ting (陳冠廷) and other international strategy experts took part in a forum organized by the Formosa Republican Association to mark the 45th anniversary of the US’ Taiwan Relations Act (TRA).
Forums related to the TRA have generally involved more reminiscences than visions, as Taiwan was for a long time stuck in the rut of strategic ambiguity.
However there was a completely different climate at this forum, as could be seen from Hsiao’s and Chen’s remarks, and the evidence presented by experts and academics.
The new climate has emerged because of the changes in the international strategic situation. The world has entered the age of strategic clarity.
As international relations expert and regular On Taiwan columnist Guermantes Lailari said at the forum, the very title of the TRA made it clear from the outset that Taiwan is Taiwan. The US sought to ally itself with China against the Soviet Union during the Cold War and to join hands with China to fight terrorism during the War on Terror, and only for these reasons was it temporarily inconvenient to openly offend China.
That is why the US repeatedly said that it “acknowledges” that China defines Taiwan as one of its provinces, but Washington has never agreed with or recognized such a claim.
Now that the age of strategic clarity has started, US support for Taiwan is becoming ever clearer. It has in repeated public statements emphasized that Taiwan is Taiwan and changes of regime in China have nothing to do with Taiwan.
Miles Yu (余茂春), who served as China policy adviser to former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo in former US president Donald Trump’s administration, presented a pre-recorded talk at the forum in which he said that some details of the TRA are still less than ideal.
For example, the region to which it applies only includes Taiwan proper and the Penghu archipelago, which the TRA calls the Pescadores, but Yu said that it should include Kinmen and Lienchiang counties off the coast of China’s Fujian Province, as well as Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島) and Itu Aba Island (Taiping Island, 太平島) in the South China Sea. Also, the TRA talks about “the people on Taiwan,” which would include any foreign tourist who sets foot in the nation, so this should be corrected to “Taiwanese.”
Regarding these two loopholes in the TRA, as well as other experts’ suggestions that the TRA could go further than it does, the government and public should work hand in hand to have closer interactions with the US Congress and urge it to make amendments that improve the TRA.
Another thing to aim for is for not just the US, but also at least the world’s most important countries to have their own versions of a TRA. This idea is no flight of fancy given that the newly established Conservative Party of Japan, which has a former mayor of Sendai as one of its advisers, has as one of its main demands that Japan should enact its own version of the TRA.
The government and public can march separately and strike together to establish contact with Taiwan-friendly parties and politicians in the world’s most important countries, and ask them to promote the enactment of their own TRAs.
If the US, Japan, the UK, Australia, Canada, Germany, France, Spain, Italy and Switzerland all had TRAs, they would be obliged to obey the law, providing greater safeguards for Taiwan’s security and boosting the nation’s progress toward being a normal country.
Tommy Lin is president of the Formosa Republican Association and the Taiwan United Nations Alliance.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s