On Saturday last week, vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴), Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chen Kuan-ting (陳冠廷) and other international strategy experts took part in a forum organized by the Formosa Republican Association to mark the 45th anniversary of the US’ Taiwan Relations Act (TRA).
Forums related to the TRA have generally involved more reminiscences than visions, as Taiwan was for a long time stuck in the rut of strategic ambiguity.
However there was a completely different climate at this forum, as could be seen from Hsiao’s and Chen’s remarks, and the evidence presented by experts and academics.
The new climate has emerged because of the changes in the international strategic situation. The world has entered the age of strategic clarity.
As international relations expert and regular On Taiwan columnist Guermantes Lailari said at the forum, the very title of the TRA made it clear from the outset that Taiwan is Taiwan. The US sought to ally itself with China against the Soviet Union during the Cold War and to join hands with China to fight terrorism during the War on Terror, and only for these reasons was it temporarily inconvenient to openly offend China.
That is why the US repeatedly said that it “acknowledges” that China defines Taiwan as one of its provinces, but Washington has never agreed with or recognized such a claim.
Now that the age of strategic clarity has started, US support for Taiwan is becoming ever clearer. It has in repeated public statements emphasized that Taiwan is Taiwan and changes of regime in China have nothing to do with Taiwan.
Miles Yu (余茂春), who served as China policy adviser to former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo in former US president Donald Trump’s administration, presented a pre-recorded talk at the forum in which he said that some details of the TRA are still less than ideal.
For example, the region to which it applies only includes Taiwan proper and the Penghu archipelago, which the TRA calls the Pescadores, but Yu said that it should include Kinmen and Lienchiang counties off the coast of China’s Fujian Province, as well as Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島) and Itu Aba Island (Taiping Island, 太平島) in the South China Sea. Also, the TRA talks about “the people on Taiwan,” which would include any foreign tourist who sets foot in the nation, so this should be corrected to “Taiwanese.”
Regarding these two loopholes in the TRA, as well as other experts’ suggestions that the TRA could go further than it does, the government and public should work hand in hand to have closer interactions with the US Congress and urge it to make amendments that improve the TRA.
Another thing to aim for is for not just the US, but also at least the world’s most important countries to have their own versions of a TRA. This idea is no flight of fancy given that the newly established Conservative Party of Japan, which has a former mayor of Sendai as one of its advisers, has as one of its main demands that Japan should enact its own version of the TRA.
The government and public can march separately and strike together to establish contact with Taiwan-friendly parties and politicians in the world’s most important countries, and ask them to promote the enactment of their own TRAs.
If the US, Japan, the UK, Australia, Canada, Germany, France, Spain, Italy and Switzerland all had TRAs, they would be obliged to obey the law, providing greater safeguards for Taiwan’s security and boosting the nation’s progress toward being a normal country.
Tommy Lin is president of the Formosa Republican Association and the Taiwan United Nations Alliance.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Would China attack Taiwan during the American lame duck period? For months, there have been worries that Beijing would seek to take advantage of an American president slowed by age and a potentially chaotic transition to make a move on Taiwan. In the wake of an American election that ended without drama, that far-fetched scenario will likely prove purely hypothetical. But there is a crisis brewing elsewhere in Asia — one with which US president-elect Donald Trump may have to deal during his first days in office. Tensions between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea have been at
Russian President Vladimir Putin’s hypersonic missile carried a simple message to the West over Ukraine: Back off, and if you do not, Russia reserves the right to hit US and British military facilities. Russia fired a new intermediate-range hypersonic ballistic missile known as “Oreshnik,” or Hazel Tree, at Ukraine on Thursday in what Putin said was a direct response to strikes on Russia by Ukrainian forces with US and British missiles. In a special statement from the Kremlin just after 8pm in Moscow that day, the Russian president said the war was escalating toward a global conflict, although he avoided any nuclear
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”