Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked.
NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.”
China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.”
However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Ukraine, desires that Taiwanese and the international community should be aware of.
Putin and Xi have made it clear that they do not like or accept the international status of their smaller neighbors, which they regard as an affront to their nation’s pride that must be rectified. For Putin, Ukraine’s independence is a reminder of Russia’s weakness as the Soviet Union collapsed. Putin sees Ukraine’s “return” to Russia as being necessary to make amends for that humiliation.
For Xi, Taiwan’s independence is a reminder of Chinese weakness and “humiliation” at the hands of imperial powers. The “return” of Taiwan must be completed so China can achieve its “great rejuvenation.”
Putin and Xi wield a distorted version of history and identity to justify their territorial claims. Putin says that the “territory” of Ukraine has always been Russian. China says Taiwan “has belonged to China since ancient times.” Both are perfect examples of bad history. Not the objective study of events, but the instrumentalization of their own history to serve strategic goals.
Both have a worrying disregard for the rights of people to decide their future. Putin disregards the reality that Ukrainians are a separate people from Russians. Xi says that Taiwanese are Chinese. Both regard independent Ukrainian and Taiwanese identities as being the creation of hostile forces in the West to weaken their respective nations.
Terrifyingly, Putin used the “protection” of ethnic Russians who he said had been undergoing “forced assimilation” as a pretext for his 2014 and 2022 invasions. The Chinese Communist Party’s characterization of Taiwanese identity as being the result of “desinicization” programs and moves toward independence are therefore worrying.
The logic of Putin and Xi is the logic of empires, territorial conquest and revanchist nationalism. At its heart is a fundamental rejection of post-World War II norms that found expression in the creation of the UN and the EU, signifying that nationalist wars of conquest are a thing of the past and the rights of states should not override the rights of people to choose their future.
Yale historian Timothy Snyder has said that “Ukraine is a place that helps us to understand other places... It’s not just a place which gets defined by Russia... Ukraine has been at the center of all of these 20th century and 21st century trends that are essential to understand.”
Indeed, Ukraine helps us to understand Taiwan, and Taiwan helps us to understand Ukraine. They are ground zero for understanding today’s major geopolitical challenges. Xi wants to conquer Taiwan as Putin does Ukraine, goals that pose a fundamental challenge to the core principles of the post-war order. Putin losing in Ukraine is about more than Ukraine. It is about defending the liberal international order and teaching authoritarian revanchist powers that the democratic world is not going to let them force a return to a 19th-century world where might makes right.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s