Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked.
NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.”
China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.”
However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Ukraine, desires that Taiwanese and the international community should be aware of.
Putin and Xi have made it clear that they do not like or accept the international status of their smaller neighbors, which they regard as an affront to their nation’s pride that must be rectified. For Putin, Ukraine’s independence is a reminder of Russia’s weakness as the Soviet Union collapsed. Putin sees Ukraine’s “return” to Russia as being necessary to make amends for that humiliation.
For Xi, Taiwan’s independence is a reminder of Chinese weakness and “humiliation” at the hands of imperial powers. The “return” of Taiwan must be completed so China can achieve its “great rejuvenation.”
Putin and Xi wield a distorted version of history and identity to justify their territorial claims. Putin says that the “territory” of Ukraine has always been Russian. China says Taiwan “has belonged to China since ancient times.” Both are perfect examples of bad history. Not the objective study of events, but the instrumentalization of their own history to serve strategic goals.
Both have a worrying disregard for the rights of people to decide their future. Putin disregards the reality that Ukrainians are a separate people from Russians. Xi says that Taiwanese are Chinese. Both regard independent Ukrainian and Taiwanese identities as being the creation of hostile forces in the West to weaken their respective nations.
Terrifyingly, Putin used the “protection” of ethnic Russians who he said had been undergoing “forced assimilation” as a pretext for his 2014 and 2022 invasions. The Chinese Communist Party’s characterization of Taiwanese identity as being the result of “desinicization” programs and moves toward independence are therefore worrying.
The logic of Putin and Xi is the logic of empires, territorial conquest and revanchist nationalism. At its heart is a fundamental rejection of post-World War II norms that found expression in the creation of the UN and the EU, signifying that nationalist wars of conquest are a thing of the past and the rights of states should not override the rights of people to choose their future.
Yale historian Timothy Snyder has said that “Ukraine is a place that helps us to understand other places... It’s not just a place which gets defined by Russia... Ukraine has been at the center of all of these 20th century and 21st century trends that are essential to understand.”
Indeed, Ukraine helps us to understand Taiwan, and Taiwan helps us to understand Ukraine. They are ground zero for understanding today’s major geopolitical challenges. Xi wants to conquer Taiwan as Putin does Ukraine, goals that pose a fundamental challenge to the core principles of the post-war order. Putin losing in Ukraine is about more than Ukraine. It is about defending the liberal international order and teaching authoritarian revanchist powers that the democratic world is not going to let them force a return to a 19th-century world where might makes right.
Two major Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-People’s Liberation Army (PLA) power demonstrations in November 2024 highlight the urgency for Taiwan to pursue a military buildup and deterrence agenda that can take back control of its destiny. First, the CCP-PLA’s planned future for Taiwan of war, bloody suppression, and use as a base for regional aggression was foreshadowed by the 9th and largest PLA-Russia Joint Bomber Exercise of Nov. 29 and 30. It was double that of previous bomber exercises, with both days featuring combined combat strike groups of PLA Air Force and Russian bombers escorted by PLAAF and Russian fighters, airborne early warning
For three years and three months, Taiwan’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) has remained stalled. On Nov. 29, members meeting in Vancouver agreed to establish a working group for Costa Rica’s entry — the fifth applicant in line — but not for Taiwan. As Taiwan’s prospects for CPTPP membership fade due to “politically sensitive issues,” what strategy should it adopt to overcome this politically motivated economic exclusion? The situation is not entirely dim; these challenges offer an opportunity to reimagine the export-driven country’s international trade strategy. Following the US’ withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership
Since the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation has taken Taiwanese students to visit China and invited Chinese students to Taiwan. Ma calls those activities “cross-strait exchanges,” yet the trips completely avoid topics prohibited by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), such as democracy, freedom and human rights — all of which are universal values. During the foundation’s most recent Chinese student tour group, a Fudan University student used terms such as “China, Taipei” and “the motherland” when discussing Taiwan’s recent baseball victory. The group’s visit to Zhongshan Girls’ High School also received prominent coverage in
Late on Tuesday evening, South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol declared martial law. A BBC analysis cited as reasons the opposition parties’ majority in the National Assembly, their continued boycott of the national budget and the impeachment of key officials and prosecutors, leading to frequent government gridlock. During the years that Taiwan and South Korea traveled the road to democratization, our countries hit many potholes. Taiwan cannot return to the Martial Law era. Despite the similarities in our authoritarian past, Yoon’s political travails are far removed from the issues Taiwan faces. Yoon’s actions are a wake-up call to the world about
RSS