The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has proposed a bill to suspend a phased-in reduction of the public pension income replacement ratio that was implemented in 2018. The amendment would not only reintroduce greater financial risks to the pension system, but would also increase the burden on the younger generation.
To alleviate a longstanding fiscal deficit problem — with a NT$300 billion (US$9.27 billion) deficit in 2014 rising to NT$600 billion in 2018 — that would lead to the bankruptcy of pension funds as early as 2030, affecting more than 450,000 retired public officials, teachers and military personnel, the Legislative Yuan in June 2017 passed a package of pension reforms proposed by the Democratic Progress Party (DPP) government under President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文).
The reforms included gradually decreasing the controversial high pension income replacement ratio to a low of 30 to 60 percent depending on years of service, as well as reducing an annual 18 percent preferential interest rate on pension payments to zero over a period of 30 months.
The legislation also raised the retirement eligibility age to 65 starting in 2026, eliminating options for civil servants and teachers to retire as early as 55, which had worsened a labor shortage driven by Taiwan’s low birthrate.
With these measures having taken effect from 2018, the current retirement funds can be kept operational for another 10 to 15 years, easing the payment burden on young workers. Official data show that the reforms have so far saved more than NT$267 billion in pension expenditure. From 2026, total savings from expenditure and government statutory payments made to the pension fund would rise to NT$300 billion per year, a significant contribution to the sustainability of pensions.
However, the KMT caucus recently proposed an amendment to the Act Governing Civil Servants’ Retirement, Discharge and Pensions (公務人員退休資遣撫卹法) to freeze the reduction in the pension income replacement ratio. The DPP proposed to veto the amendment and the legislature held a poll on Friday last week to vote on the DPP’s proposal. The results showed that the KMT prevailed with 48 votes against the DPP’s 47 votes, while all Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) legislators abstained from the vote.
However, a procedural flaw was found in that a KMT legislator had not signed in, but his name still appeared in the first voting round. Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) on Tuesday unveiled an investigation report that concluded the “rigged” voting was due to human error involving staff. The result was annulled and another vote is to be held soon.
Based on its slim majority in the legislature, the KMT very likely will win the revote. However, it should be noted that the KMT government during Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) presidency from 2008-2016 had promised to reform the pension system, and proposed eliminating the preferential rate and cutting the pension income ratio. Yet Ma’s administration did not accomplish the needed reform.
Pension reform is undoubtedly a sensitive and difficult issue, but whoever is in power has to face the problem of worsening pension deficits. The reform should not be backtracked. Political parties that block pension reform without proposing a better solution should take responsibility.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s