The US’ youngest-ever elected president, John F. Kennedy, put civic duty at the heart of his 1961 call to “ask what you can do for your country.” Today’s leaders are trying to drum up the same spirit among young people, especially in Europe where the war in Ukraine has 40-something leaders such as Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas extending conscription and French President Emmanuel Macron calling for civic rearmament.
However, let us not forget to ask older generations, such as the retiring baby-boomer cohort that might have grown up listening to Kennedy’s speech, to do their bit. They are also likely to need to accept sacrifices as the era of the “peace dividend” gives way to a paradigm shift in defense investment that could saddle G7 countries with an extra US$10 trillion in spending by 2034.
The narrative of generational inequality is well-traveled, with stacks of books telling how boomers bequeathed misery to their millennial children. Saddled with student debt, the young suffered stagnating wages and were denied the rites of passage of home ownership and parenthood while their own parents accumulated wealth.
Illustration: Mountain People
It is a narrative that has slightly softened in the past few years as wages rise, unemployment falls and overvalued houses become a bit more affordable.
Yet the UK and continental Europe’s generational divides still look very stark after the COVID-19 pandemic and as the Ukraine war grinds on. Young workers who became a hot commodity after lockdown face a cooling labor market and stalling economic growth, even as talk of rearmament delivers record orders for the likes of Germany’s Rheinmetall AG and brings military service back to dinner-table conversation.
Home-ownership levels have started to bounce back, but not enough to close the generational divide. Declining birthrates also highlight how having children is increasingly a choice seen as unaffordable by millennials.
Meanwhile, social spending is still geared toward the retirees and boomers who were most protected during the pandemic and who have the most wealth, which partly explains why cruise ships are bracing for another record-breaking year. In the UK, pension protections such as the triple lock and cuts to working-age benefits collectively mean non-pensioners are more than £2,200 (US$2,736) a year worse off on average since 2010, while pensioners are less than £200 a year worse off, the Resolution Foundation has said.
In France, despite Macron’s abortive attempts to rebalance taxation in favor of workers, pensioners had a better standard of living than workers going into the pandemic.
At a time when extra military spending is rekindling the “guns or butter” question — namely, at what point governments will have to cut social spending to fund defense — it should again be asked whether all generations are ready to make sacrifices. Capping or curbing overall welfare spending will not make the system fairer for those who governments are trying to persuade to don military fatigues or reverse declining birthrates; boomers would still be the net beneficiaries.
Even without adding defense into the mix, the implied future cost of payouts such as pensions is rising from one generation to the next: This “intertemporal budget gap” stood at 251 percent of GDP for the EU in 2019, a European Commission paper said.
Shifting to a pro-youth playbook means reallocating priorities: making homes more affordable, by expanding supply and not just subsidizing an unequal market; encouraging parenthood by expanding childcare, but also creating more jobs that do not discriminate against parenthood; prioritizing education and research; and lump-sum payments to young people instead of ring-fencing pension payouts.
“Pensioners have a higher standard of living than workers... They should be made to pay,” Jacques Attali, 80, former adviser to former French president Francois Mitterrand, said last week.
Pundits are likely to reply, with some justification, that pro-youth policies are not implemented because young people do not vote.
Yet wars transform societies. They create political awakenings, lead to better-organized societies and fund discoveries such as penicillin or the Internet — offset, of course, by the death and violence they cause.
Latvian Prime Minister Evika Silina recently told the Munich Security Conference that, after Russia’s annexation of Crimea, her country’s subsequent ramping-up of defense spending had been “easy to explain,” even if the preference would have been to focus on making pensions more generous.
This is a time of collective action, and the spirit of Kennedy’s quote should live on — all the more so as US President Joe Biden, the oldest leader in the country’s history, prepares to take on a fellow boomer, former US president Donald Trump.
Lionel Laurent is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist writing about the future of money and the future of Europe. Previously, he was a reporter for Reuters and Forbes.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s