The US’ youngest-ever elected president, John F. Kennedy, put civic duty at the heart of his 1961 call to “ask what you can do for your country.” Today’s leaders are trying to drum up the same spirit among young people, especially in Europe where the war in Ukraine has 40-something leaders such as Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas extending conscription and French President Emmanuel Macron calling for civic rearmament.
However, let us not forget to ask older generations, such as the retiring baby-boomer cohort that might have grown up listening to Kennedy’s speech, to do their bit. They are also likely to need to accept sacrifices as the era of the “peace dividend” gives way to a paradigm shift in defense investment that could saddle G7 countries with an extra US$10 trillion in spending by 2034.
The narrative of generational inequality is well-traveled, with stacks of books telling how boomers bequeathed misery to their millennial children. Saddled with student debt, the young suffered stagnating wages and were denied the rites of passage of home ownership and parenthood while their own parents accumulated wealth.
Illustration: Mountain People
It is a narrative that has slightly softened in the past few years as wages rise, unemployment falls and overvalued houses become a bit more affordable.
Yet the UK and continental Europe’s generational divides still look very stark after the COVID-19 pandemic and as the Ukraine war grinds on. Young workers who became a hot commodity after lockdown face a cooling labor market and stalling economic growth, even as talk of rearmament delivers record orders for the likes of Germany’s Rheinmetall AG and brings military service back to dinner-table conversation.
Home-ownership levels have started to bounce back, but not enough to close the generational divide. Declining birthrates also highlight how having children is increasingly a choice seen as unaffordable by millennials.
Meanwhile, social spending is still geared toward the retirees and boomers who were most protected during the pandemic and who have the most wealth, which partly explains why cruise ships are bracing for another record-breaking year. In the UK, pension protections such as the triple lock and cuts to working-age benefits collectively mean non-pensioners are more than ￡2,200 (US$2,736) a year worse off on average since 2010, while pensioners are less than ￡200 a year worse off, the Resolution Foundation has said.
In France, despite Macron’s abortive attempts to rebalance taxation in favor of workers, pensioners had a better standard of living than workers going into the pandemic.
At a time when extra military spending is rekindling the “guns or butter” question — namely, at what point governments will have to cut social spending to fund defense — it should again be asked whether all generations are ready to make sacrifices. Capping or curbing overall welfare spending will not make the system fairer for those who governments are trying to persuade to don military fatigues or reverse declining birthrates; boomers would still be the net beneficiaries.
Even without adding defense into the mix, the implied future cost of payouts such as pensions is rising from one generation to the next: This “intertemporal budget gap” stood at 251 percent of GDP for the EU in 2019, a European Commission paper said.
Shifting to a pro-youth playbook means reallocating priorities: making homes more affordable, by expanding supply and not just subsidizing an unequal market; encouraging parenthood by expanding childcare, but also creating more jobs that do not discriminate against parenthood; prioritizing education and research; and lump-sum payments to young people instead of ring-fencing pension payouts.
“Pensioners have a higher standard of living than workers... They should be made to pay,” Jacques Attali, 80, former adviser to former French president Francois Mitterrand, said last week.
Pundits are likely to reply, with some justification, that pro-youth policies are not implemented because young people do not vote.
Yet wars transform societies. They create political awakenings, lead to better-organized societies and fund discoveries such as penicillin or the Internet — offset, of course, by the death and violence they cause.
Latvian Prime Minister Evika Silina recently told the Munich Security Conference that, after Russia’s annexation of Crimea, her country’s subsequent ramping-up of defense spending had been “easy to explain,” even if the preference would have been to focus on making pensions more generous.
This is a time of collective action, and the spirit of Kennedy’s quote should live on — all the more so as US President Joe Biden, the oldest leader in the country’s history, prepares to take on a fellow boomer, former US president Donald Trump.
Lionel Laurent is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist writing about the future of money and the future of Europe. Previously, he was a reporter for Reuters and Forbes.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Russian President Vladimir Putin’s hypersonic missile carried a simple message to the West over Ukraine: Back off, and if you do not, Russia reserves the right to hit US and British military facilities. Russia fired a new intermediate-range hypersonic ballistic missile known as “Oreshnik,” or Hazel Tree, at Ukraine on Thursday in what Putin said was a direct response to strikes on Russia by Ukrainian forces with US and British missiles. In a special statement from the Kremlin just after 8pm in Moscow that day, the Russian president said the war was escalating toward a global conflict, although he avoided any nuclear
Would China attack Taiwan during the American lame duck period? For months, there have been worries that Beijing would seek to take advantage of an American president slowed by age and a potentially chaotic transition to make a move on Taiwan. In the wake of an American election that ended without drama, that far-fetched scenario will likely prove purely hypothetical. But there is a crisis brewing elsewhere in Asia — one with which US president-elect Donald Trump may have to deal during his first days in office. Tensions between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea have been at
US President-elect Donald Trump has been declaring his personnel picks for his incoming Cabinet. Many are staunchly opposed to China. South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem, Trump’s nomination to be his next secretary of the US Department of Homeland Security, said that since 2000, China has had a long-term plan to destroy the US. US Representative Mike Waltz, nominated by Trump to be national security adviser, has stated that the US is engaged in a cold war with China, and has criticized Canada as being weak on Beijing. Even more vocal and unequivocal than these two Cabinet picks is Trump’s nomination for
An article written by Uber Eats Taiwan general manager Chai Lee (李佳穎) published in the Liberty Times (sister paper of the Taipei Times) on Tuesday said that Uber Eats promises to engage in negotiations to create a “win-win” situation. The article asserted that Uber Eats’ acquisition of Foodpanda would bring about better results for Taiwan. The National Delivery Industrial Union (NDIU), a trade union for food couriers in Taiwan, would like to express its doubts about and dissatisfaction with Lee’s article — if Uber Eats truly has a clear plan, why has this so-called plan not been presented at relevant
RSS