KMT needs to rethink its role
A few days ago, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), along with other lawmakers, submitted a bill to amend the Budget Act (預算法). The proposal would require special budgets put forth by the executive branch to undergo legislative approval, while removing several provisions in the act. If an emergency occurred, nothing could be done to directly push through a special budget.
Were Hsu’s amendment to pass, Hualien County, struck by a massive earthquake on April 3 — the constituency most severely affected by the temblor, represented by KMT caucus convener and former Hualien County commissioner Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) — and other potential disaster zones would be unable to access immediate response funds and resources.
The KMT lawmakers in this legislative session have proposed several constitutionally debilitating and chaos-inducing bills in the name of “legislative reform.”
They are incapable of picking up on the public pulse.
The Taiwanese Public Opinion Foundation’s latest political party survey showed that KMT support is dropping, falling to about 10 percent below that of the Democratic Progressive Party. Last month’s My-Formosa.com poll showed that satisfaction with the KMT had fallen the most, whereas dissatisfaction with the party had risen the most.
It goes to show that the KMT — the largest opposition party — has since the beginning of the new legislative session on Feb. 1 put nothing forth except a series of offbeat, hubris-fueled bills. The KMT’s absurd political behavior is a slap in the face of public opinion.
It is a given that Taiwan’s opposition parties should serve as a check on the governing party, but acting in a supervisory capacity should be based on helping Taiwan’s national development. The KMT should not give the public the impression that it exists only to be a troublemaker. From the KMT chairman downward, each tier of its public officials and even supporters ought to take note of public sentiment and fight to advance Taiwan’s interests.
The KMT should pay no heed to Chinese Communist Party directives, which make it appear as if it is helping China to annex Taiwan.
If not, the KMT would be walking a thorny path if it wishes to gain a majority in the central government.
Chiu Ping-chin
Taipei
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
RSS