Concern that the Great Barrier Reef might be experiencing the most severe mass coral bleaching event on record has escalated after a conservation group released footage showing damage up to 18m below the surface.
Selina Ward, a marine biologist and former academic director of the University of Queensland’s Heron Island Research Station, said it was the worst bleaching she had seen in 30 years working on the reef, and that some coral was starting to die.
The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority earlier this month said that aerial surveys of more than 1,000 individual reefs revealed more than half were rated as having high or very high levels of bleaching, and a smaller number in the south — less than 10 percent of the total — had extreme bleaching. Only about a quarter were relatively unaffected.
Illustration: Yusha
It confirmed the 2,300km reef system was experiencing its fifth mass bleaching event in eight years. The authority said sea surface temperatures had been between 0.5°C and 1.5°C hotter than expected for this time of year.
The Australian Marine Conservation Society on Thursday last week released video and photos that it said showed bleaching on the southern part of the reef extended to greater depths than had been previously reported this year.
Ward said the impact of bleaching had been extensive across 16 sites that she visited in the reef’s southern section, affecting coral species that had usually been resistant to bleaching. Some coral had started to die, a process that usually takes weeks or months after bleaching occurs.
“I feel devastated,” she said. “I’ve been working on the reef since 1992 but this [event], I’m really struggling with.”
Coral bleaching describes a process where the coral animal expels the algae that live in their tissues and give them their color and much of their nutrients.
Without their algae, a coral’s white skeleton can be seen through their translucent flesh, giving a bleached appearance.
Mass coral bleaching over large areas, first noticed in the 1980s around the Caribbean, is caused by rising ocean temperatures.
Some corals also display fluorescent colors under stress when they release a pigment that filters light. Sunlight also plays a role in triggering bleaching.
Corals can survive bleaching if temperatures are not too extreme or prolonged, but extreme marine heatwaves could kill corals outright.
Coral bleaching can also have sub-lethal effects, including increased susceptibility to disease and reduced rates of growth and reproduction.
Scientists say the gaps between bleaching events are becoming too short to allow reefs to recover.
Coral reefs are considered one of the planet’s ecosystems most at risk from global heating. Reefs support fisheries that feed hundreds of millions of people, as well as supporting major tourism industries.
The world’s biggest coral reef system — Australia’s Great Barrier Reef — has suffered seven mass bleaching events since 1998, of which five were in the past decade.
Ward said sea temperatures at two of the sites she visited were the same at the surface and 20m below the surface. This was “very unusual,” and reinforced the need for rapid action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, she said.
“What are we doing to stop the reef from being lost?” Ward said. “We cannot expect to save the Great Barrier Reef and be opening new fossil fuel developments. It is time to act and there are no more excuses.”
Coral bleaching occurs when the coral becomes heat-stressed and ejects the tiny marine algae, known as zooxanthellae, that live in its tissue and give most of its color and energy. With the zooxanthellae gone, the coral starves and its bone-white calcium skeleton becomes visible.
If the elevated temperature does not last long, the coral can recover. Otherwise, it starts to die. In the most severe cases, the bleaching is skipped and the coral dies almost immediately, usually turning a dirty brown.
Terry Hughes, an emeritus professor at James Cook University and longtime reef bleaching researcher, said the aerial surveys showed “the most widespread and most severe mass bleaching and mortality event ever recorded on the Great Barrier Reef.”
He said the scale of the damage was comparable to 2016, the worst previous year experienced, but there were now fewer individual reefs untouched by bleaching between southern Queensland and the Torres Strait. He said the area south of Townsville had been particularly badly hit this year.
“We are already seeing extensive loss of corals at the time of peak bleaching,” he said. “It is heartbreaking to see damage as severe as this as soon as this.”
Hughes said every part of the reef system had now bleached at least once since 1998. Some reefs had bleached three or four times. He said the cumulative damage made it harder for reefs to recover and more likely they would succumb.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in 2018 found that most tropical coral reefs would be lost if global heating was limited to an average of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and 99 percent were likely to be lost if heating reached 2°C. They found they would be at high risk at 1.2°C, a level that might have already been reached.
Australian Marine Conservation Society reef campaign manager Lissa Schindler called on the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority to release maps showing the extent and severity of the bleaching so the public had a true picture of the scale of the impact.
Schindler also urged the authority, which she described as the reef’s custodian, to play a greater role in advocating for stronger action on emissions.
She said in the past the authority had called for “strong and fast national action” to deal with the climate crisis, but a more recent climate statement it issued focused on global action and did not say anything about Australia needing to increase what it was doing.
“If the [Austrlian Prime Minister Anthony] Albanese government is serious about its commitment to UNESCO to protect the reef then it must commit to net zero emissions by 2035 and stop approving new fossil fuel projects,” she said.
Scientists have said the government’s emissions reduction targets — a 43 percent cut compared with 2005 levels and net zero by 2050 — are consistent with global action that could lead to 2°C of global heating.
Interviewed on Australian Broadcast Corp’s Radio National on Wednesday, Australian Minister for the Environment and Water Tanya Plibersek said the government was “very concerned about the bleaching that we see at the moment, sadly, not just on the Great Barrier Reef, but right around the world.”
She said the government was doing “whatever we can” to get to net zero emissions. “We need to protect the reef because it is… unique in the world and also 64,000 people rely on it for their work,” she said.
A reef authority spokesperson said it confirmed early last month that widespread coral bleaching was unfolding. They said in-water coral surveys were continuing and a report including data and maps would be published “in the coming weeks.”
Would China attack Taiwan during the American lame duck period? For months, there have been worries that Beijing would seek to take advantage of an American president slowed by age and a potentially chaotic transition to make a move on Taiwan. In the wake of an American election that ended without drama, that far-fetched scenario will likely prove purely hypothetical. But there is a crisis brewing elsewhere in Asia — one with which US president-elect Donald Trump may have to deal during his first days in office. Tensions between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea have been at
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
Historically, in Taiwan, and in present-day China, many people advocate the idea of a “great Chinese nation.” It is not worth arguing with extremists to say that the so-called “great Chinese nation” is a fabricated political myth rather than an academic term. Rather, they should read the following excerpt from Chinese writer Lin Yutang’s (林語堂) book My Country and My People: “It is also inevitable that I should offend many writers about China, especially my own countrymen and great patriots. These great patriots — I have nothing to do with them, for their god is not my god, and their patriotism is