In today’s highly information-based society, the question of how to appropriately regulate large-scale transnational social media platforms has become an unavoidable issue for all democratic countries.
When considering the many available policy options, the key question is how to ensure that the majority of Internet users, and of digital network and communications businesses, are not harmed by fraudulent criminal activities.
Looking back over the past few years, although the government has put a lot of effort into informing the public about various kinds of fraud, it has been hard for such public information messages to reach a wide audience.
However, you only have to go onto Facebook, which is as popular in Taiwan as anywhere else, and you would see things like a fake version of cosmetic surgeon Chiu Cheng-hung (邱正宏) selling weight loss pills, a bogus version of traditional Chinese medicine doctor Wu Ming-chu (吳明珠) peddling anti-wrinkle creams, a copy of business media chairman Hsieh Chin-ho (謝金河) advertising services to teach people how to make a fortune from stocks and shares and a phony lookalike of radio host Hsia Yun-fen (夏韻芬) sharing her tips on playing the stock market.
The reason why such fraudulent messages spread so quickly and widely is that social media platforms make money from accepting and pushing advertisements placed by fraud syndicates.
Analyzed according to the “broken windows theory” of criminal psychology, this situation arises because, in the absence of statutory controls, fraudulent advertisements on social media platforms are not promptly blocked or corrected.
This is why there are so many complaints from the public about the government’s failure to effectively combat online fraud.
Earlier this month, the Cabinet convened a number of ministries responsible for combating fraud, namely the National Communications Commission, the Ministry of Digital Affairs, the Financial Supervisory Commission and the Ministry of Justice, to work on drafting a law specifically aimed at combatting fraud.
This is good news, but the authorities should bear in mind that, while criminals might seem like ghosts hiding in the labyrinths of online social media platforms, the culprits who allow disinformation to reach large numbers of people are the social media companies that make money from doing so.
That is why the EU’s Digital Services Act adopts a hierarchical management approach, requiring the onshore regulation of major offshore platforms.
Hopefully, in the next few months, Taiwan’s ruling and opposition parties would set aside partisan rivalry and have the courage to follow the examples of the EU and UK legal systems in establishing effective platform governance regulations to calm the chaos of online fraud.
Lo Cheng-chung is a policy committee member of the Taiwan Nation Alliance and director of Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology’s Institute of Financial and Economic Law.
Translated by Julian Clegg
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS