In today’s highly information-based society, the question of how to appropriately regulate large-scale transnational social media platforms has become an unavoidable issue for all democratic countries.
When considering the many available policy options, the key question is how to ensure that the majority of Internet users, and of digital network and communications businesses, are not harmed by fraudulent criminal activities.
Looking back over the past few years, although the government has put a lot of effort into informing the public about various kinds of fraud, it has been hard for such public information messages to reach a wide audience.
However, you only have to go onto Facebook, which is as popular in Taiwan as anywhere else, and you would see things like a fake version of cosmetic surgeon Chiu Cheng-hung (邱正宏) selling weight loss pills, a bogus version of traditional Chinese medicine doctor Wu Ming-chu (吳明珠) peddling anti-wrinkle creams, a copy of business media chairman Hsieh Chin-ho (謝金河) advertising services to teach people how to make a fortune from stocks and shares and a phony lookalike of radio host Hsia Yun-fen (夏韻芬) sharing her tips on playing the stock market.
The reason why such fraudulent messages spread so quickly and widely is that social media platforms make money from accepting and pushing advertisements placed by fraud syndicates.
Analyzed according to the “broken windows theory” of criminal psychology, this situation arises because, in the absence of statutory controls, fraudulent advertisements on social media platforms are not promptly blocked or corrected.
This is why there are so many complaints from the public about the government’s failure to effectively combat online fraud.
Earlier this month, the Cabinet convened a number of ministries responsible for combating fraud, namely the National Communications Commission, the Ministry of Digital Affairs, the Financial Supervisory Commission and the Ministry of Justice, to work on drafting a law specifically aimed at combatting fraud.
This is good news, but the authorities should bear in mind that, while criminals might seem like ghosts hiding in the labyrinths of online social media platforms, the culprits who allow disinformation to reach large numbers of people are the social media companies that make money from doing so.
That is why the EU’s Digital Services Act adopts a hierarchical management approach, requiring the onshore regulation of major offshore platforms.
Hopefully, in the next few months, Taiwan’s ruling and opposition parties would set aside partisan rivalry and have the courage to follow the examples of the EU and UK legal systems in establishing effective platform governance regulations to calm the chaos of online fraud.
Lo Cheng-chung is a policy committee member of the Taiwan Nation Alliance and director of Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology’s Institute of Financial and Economic Law.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS