Taiwan values hard work and is an exciting, young democracy. This month, it has an opportunity to keep moving forward in its progressive political journey.
Taiwan ranks higher on The Economist Intelligence Unit’s Democracy Index than any other country in Asia and is second in Asia on Freedom House’s list of free countries. Its rankings on both indices are higher than those of my country, the US, which is often seen as a model.
I have been inspired by my friends in the Taiwanese human rights community who take full advantage of the open civic space to champion national human rights causes, and provide needed solidarity and support to activists struggling in less open societies in the region.
Taiwan is becoming internationally known for making sensible public policy. My friends and family were deeply worried for my safety when they saw news of the earthquake last week. It registered at 7.2 on the Richter scale, which would have left a greater trail of destruction and a higher death toll in many other countries. However, Taiwan’s policies, implemented since the devastating 921 Earthquake, made it well-prepared.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Taiwan showed the world what sound public health policy could look like. My own country saw more than 1 million deaths, with a 5.7 percent mortality rate compared with Taiwan’s 0.186 percent. Decisions in the US were clouded by a highly chaotic and politically charged debate about basic public health measures that no one questioned in Taiwan.
This month, Taiwan has a significant opportunity regarding sensible public policy and international human rights norms. The Constitutional Court is evaluating the constitutionality of the death penalty. Only 27 percent of the world’s countries have retained this punishment for ordinary crimes. Most of these have authoritarian regimes, with the US being a major outlier.
In my 15 years working for Amnesty International in the US, I have witnessed how the death penalty is a blight on any country that aligns itself with human rights. Its staying power primarily comes from politicians’ ability to manipulate the public’s fears, rather than from any proven impact on deterring violent crime or delivering justice without deadly errors and bias. After a few decades of discovering an incredible number of innocence cases, the clamor to execute prisoners has become less loud.
High-profile murder cases in Taiwan predictably result in cries for the death penalty, amplified by a media that provokes drama. With 0.8 murders in 100,000 compared with 7 in 100,000 in the US, I would argue that Taiwan does not have a serious violent crime problem, despite the tragedy it is to the loved ones of the victims.
Regardless of how you view violent crime in Taiwan, the US has proven that capital punishment does not lower murder rates and is a distraction from tangible services that could better help devastated victims’ families. The international community has increasingly been turning its back on the death penalty given its contradiction of the right to life, to be free from cruel and inhumane punishment and to be treated equally under the law.
Taiwan is at a crossroads. It has chosen to let the judicial system evaluate the death penalty. Now, it can rationally and objectively look at the system without inflammatory cries for vengeance or factually inaccurate claims about its utility.
The court has a momentous opportunity to evaluate whether a democracy with a Constitution that enshrines human rights can accommodate a practice that no longer aligns with international human rights norms. Should it decide that the death penalty is incompatible with the values of a liberal democracy, perhaps my country would take notice of yet another example of Taiwan leading in sound public policy.
Laura Moye is a human rights activist and teacher living in Taichung.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS