Sometimes, it can be easy to forget that we are living through the process of history being made, and how rapidly things can change.
President-elect William Lai (賴清德) has tapped National Security Council (NSC) Secretary-General Wellington Koo (顧立雄) to be the next minister of national defense. In some quarters, this appointment has been applauded, in others it has been met with some reservation. It is not an insignificant move, and has everything to do with the fact that Koo does not have a military background.
Civil-military relations can be tense for historical, political and bureaucratic reasons, and this has certainly been the case for Taiwan. The ability of any nation to ensure that the military is subordinated to the constitutional government is a fundamental requirement, and it would be deeply problematic if the defense ministry was itself part of the country’s military organization and answerable only to itself, or if the leadership system of the military was able to bypass the Ministry of National Defense.
Yet it was only in 2002, when the National Defense Act (國防法) and Organization Act of the Ministry of National Defense (國防部組織法) came into force, that the law stated that the defense minister must be a civilian and that military orders were no longer to pass directly from the president to the chief of the general staff — and must now go via the defense minister — or that the military administration and command systems were to be integrated under the ministry.
Before the enactment of those laws, Taiwan lacked an adequate institutional structure for democratic control of the military.
The military had considerable influence over the governing of the nation following the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) retreat to Taiwan in 1949. The KMT regime had relied on it for the maintenance of internal security throughout the period of martial law and had nominated active-duty generals to major government positions. For decades, the military enjoyed considerable organizational and political autonomy.
Even after the lifting of martial law in 1987, the process of transitioning to democracy and civilian control over the military would take well over a decade. The reason for the 13-year gap between the lifting of martial law and the passage of the National Defense Act was to ensure a successful democratic transition and reform of civil-military relations.
Even though the defense minister is legally required to be a civilian, the majority have come from a military background. Minister of National Defense Chiu Kuo-cheng (邱國正) is a retired general.
Defense ministers with a military background know the culture and are knowledgeable about the practical aspects of warfare and defense, from personnel and equipment to logistics in the field.
In the same vein, they are perhaps too constrained by that same culture and by entrenched loyalties to be able to effect meaningful reform.
Koo comes from a civilian background, but he has served as head of the NSC since 2020 and brings with him the experience and knowledge of security affairs gained from that position. The fact that he is not steeped in the culture of the armed forces might be the best recommendation for his ability to introduce much-needed reforms and innovations to the military.
At the same time, his appointment will help Lai oversee the completion of the democratic transition and civilian control in the civil-military relations dynamic.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS