On a recent trip to China with my students at Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management in Evanston, Illinois, we were all struck by how few Americans had returned to the country since the end of its “zero COVID-19” policy in December 2022.
In Shanghai, our tour guide had hosted only one other US school group and she expected to have only one more this year — a marked decline from the 30-plus she booked each year prior to the pandemic.
In Guilin, where the iconic mountains, a UNESCO World Heritage site, had previously been among the most visited places on Earth, we were allegedly the first American group to visit since the beginning of 2020. Only two more are expected this year.
One hopes these are low estimates and that more have and will come, but there is no denying that the number of Americans traveling to China, which plummeted during the pandemic, has been slow to recover.
This sharp decline comes at a time when US-China relations have reached their lowest point since then-US president Richard Nixon visited Mao Zedong (毛澤東) in 1972. The public discourse in both countries has become almost exclusively about zero-sum competition, if not outright hostility. While US politicians and commentators from across the political spectrum portray China as an economic and geopolitical threat, Chinese media insist that US democracy is false and that Washington is unfairly containing China’s growth and development.
With most of the news coverage in both countries focused on macroeconomic and geopolitical issues, little attention is paid to the lives and perspectives of ordinary people. Opportunities to generate empathy are scarce and the results are increasingly apparent. In US opinion polls, only 15 percent of respondents viewed China favorably last year, down from 53 percent in 2018 and 72 percent in 1989.
Some concerns are well-founded. In 2018, Americans and Canadians were shaken by China’s three-year-long detention of two Canadian non-governmental organization (NGO) workers in retaliation for the relatively mild house arrest of Meng Wanzhou (孟晚舟), a Huawei Technologies Co executive who had been charged with helping her company evade sanctions on Iran. Then came China’s pandemic lockdowns, which prompted most Americans to leave the country.
While completely understandable, the mass exodus of Americans and other expatriates has further curtailed the flow of information and in-person exchanges between the two countries’ business and NGO sectors. Add the fact that Western journalists’ activities are extremely restricted in China and it is easy to see why the country feels so foreign and opaque to many outsiders. The exciting economic opportunities and fun travel stories of just a few years ago have given way to angst and uncertainty.
However, has China changed fundamentally since 2019? Do Chinese no longer believe in the potential of markets? Do they hate Americans?
My class saw as much of the country as possible in the space of just two weeks. We visited three cities and saw many Chinese and American companies — some thriving and others fighting for survival. Students also dashed around cities and suburbs on their own to conduct independent projects.
On our last day, when I asked them what stood out the most, perspectives varied. Some were impressed by China’s transportation infrastructure and cleanliness, and by the sophistication of its economy. Others remarked on the apparent poverty amid the glamor and glitz of Shanghai and Hong Kong, and many noted the constant presence of government surveillance, but all had been pleasantly surprised by their in-person encounters and meetings with Chinese from all walks of life — from people on the street to heirs of billion-dollar family businesses. They found the Chinese to be warm and even humble.
Students who had been wary or suspicious were heartened by the experience. One had previously helped draft anti-China legislation when she worked in government and another had experienced an intense US-China standoff in the South China Sea.
A US Department of State travel advisory had left many students worried, but they wanted to know more about the country beyond what they had read in the headlines.
The joy and sense of relief were mutual. Chinese children and their parents giggled when one of my students picked up a toddler and tossed him in the air. Women selling bowls of noodles for 6 yuan (US$0.83) made sure that students who could not read Chinese received the same discounts offered to Chinese customers.
Everywhere we went, people told me that my students were a breath of fresh air — just as fun and open as they remembered Americans to be. They laughed with them, took pictures and delighted in showcasing their work to them. They had missed these Americans. After years of isolation and negative press, they had grown worried that Americans had changed.
Of course, not all Chinese and Americans would get along and the trip did not suddenly transform my students into China super-fans, but it did help them appreciate the complexity of the world’s second-most-populous country. They saw first-hand that Chinese — almost entirely absent from US news coverage — are not the same as the Chinese government or what US news headlines might suggest.
The US and China must work through many differences, which will not happen overnight. In the meantime, it is crucial that we preserve in-person interactions. Chinese and Americans must not lose sight of their common humanity. The greater the tension between their governments, the more important this becomes.
Nancy Qian, a professor of economics at Northwestern University, is codirector of the university’s Global Poverty Research Lab and founding director of China Econ Lab.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
In competitive sports, the narrative surrounding transgender athletes is often clouded by misconceptions and prejudices. Critics sometimes accuse transgender athletes of “gaming the system” to gain an unfair advantage, perpetuating the stereotype that their participation undermines the integrity of competition. However, this perspective not only ignores the rigorous efforts transgender athletes invest to meet eligibility standards, but also devalues their personal and athletic achievements. Understanding the gap between these stereotypes and the reality of individual efforts requires a deeper examination of societal bias and the challenges transgender athletes face. One of the most pervasive arguments against the inclusion of transgender athletes
When viewing Taiwan’s political chaos, I often think of several lines from Incantation, a poem by the winner of the 1980 Nobel Prize in Literature, Czeslaw Milosz: “Beautiful and very young are Philo-Sophia, and poetry, her ally in the service of the good... Their friendship will be glorious, their time has no limit, their enemies have delivered themselves to destruction.” Milosz wrote Incantation when he was a professor of Slavic Studies at the University of California, Berkeley. He firmly believed that Poland would rise again under a restored democracy and liberal order. As one of several self-exiled or expelled poets from
EDITORIAL CARTOON
RSS