For fans of the aesthetic, Taiwan is hailed as a pilgrimage destination for all things cute. Not just Hello Kitty, but cutesy characters of all kinds are just as common in the alleys of Taipei’s trendy Ximending (西門町) area as on the desk of a bank employee.
Visitors are sometimes taken aback by its ubiquity, especially in the hallowed halls of business or government, but the cognitive dissonance resonant in the minds of many Westerners appears to be absent in Taiwan. The aesthetic of cuteness seems entwined into the nation’s very fabric.
The trend is by no means exclusive to Taiwan. Neighbor and one-time colonial ruler Japan created what is there called kawaii culture, birthing the commercial powerhouses that are Hello Kitty, Pikachu and many more. Taiwan has directly emulated much of kawaii culture, including mascots to promote travel regions and events that are sure to be featured in every photo opportunity.
Yet in politics, Taiwan seems to have taken kawaii to a new level. Ahead of the January presidential and legislative elections, as in previous elections, it was almost an imperative that the candidates create cartoonized versions of themselves.
In the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) case, supporters could purchase Line stickers of a dog and cat reminiscent of the party’s candidates, Vice President William Lai (賴清德) and former representative to the US Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴), or alternatively bobble-headed cartoon stickers of Lai himself.
At the final Taiwan People’s Party rally on election eve, thousands of people thronged the streets around Ketagalan Boulevard sporting tiny green sprouts in their hair. Even tough-acting New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the former police officer who was the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, was photographed with cutesy police mascots.
Cuteness has been a part of political campaigning since as far back as 1998. Then running for Taipei mayor, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the DPP created a doll emblazoned with his nickname “A-bian.” They were an instant hit, inspiring the party to create followup versions and other accessories in subsequent elections.
The cohort of supporters more reminiscent of fan culture than politics helped Chen to victory in 2000, leading to Taiwan’s first exchange of political power since the KMT instituted martial law decades prior. Ever since, parties have had to adapt to this uniquely Taiwanese form of campaigning.
Why did Taiwan readily adopt a political aesthetic that would be unthinkable in most other nations? Taiwan nearly stands alone in the world for its peaceful and rapid transition to democracy, especially coming off the back of what at the time was the world’s longest period of martial law. With state brutality fresh in the minds of voters, the promise of a softer side to politics rang true. The DPP’s victory in 2000 marked the symbolic fulfillment of Taiwan’s road to democracy, completing the first peaceful transition of power on the back of popular support represented by the A-Bian doll and kawaii fan culture. Politicians’ subsequent embrace of cuteness is one and the same with their embrace of democracy as they seek to meet public expectations.
For proof, look no further than to Taiwan’s adversary across the Strait. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has cracked down on comparisons of his likeness to Winnie the Pooh, blacklisting the character from the Chinese Internet in 2017 and in 2018 banning the film Christopher Robin.
Authoritarians are afraid of cuteness, ostensibly because they fear it will create a weak populace. In reality, cuteness can drive an egalitarian movement that can be far more terrifying to a despot than weakness. Taiwan should remain proud of its kawaii culture and the democratic strength it belies.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS