It is election season in the US, and the country’s two main political parties are competing to show who opposes China more.
In what appears to be a lack of urgency in the discussion, Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) extension of an invitation to US President Joe Biden for talks was wholly unexpected and seems quite remarkable.
This dialogue not only shows Biden’s playing of the US-China dialogue to his advantage to shore up his electoral base for this year’s elections, but also points to his use of dialogue as a display of his administration’s effective handling of the Chinese Communist Party and US leadership in taking charge of regional developments.
At this critical juncture, American Institute in Taiwan Chairwoman Laura Rosenberger’s visit to Taiwan is of great importance. She met first with president-elect William Lai (賴清德) and vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴), and later with Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Vice Chairman Andrew Hsia (夏立言) and Taiwan People’s Party Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲).
As these meetings were taking place, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was visiting China. The Ministry of National Defense canceled its scheduled military exercises in the waters around Kinmen.
Russia’s war on Ukraine and Israel’s fight against Hamas are ongoing. Due to Israel’s airstrike on the Iranian embassy in Syria, Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr has bolstered security in the South China Sea with joint military exercises with the US, Japan and Australia.
Looking holistically at the state of events, defense analysts are predicting that China might risk incurring sanctions over possible interference by trying to “solve” geopolitical issues with Taiwan and the Philippines in one fell swoop.
With the US elections not too far off, should a conflict erupt in the Taiwan Strait, drawing Japan and South Korea into the fold, the situation could take a turn for the worse and be more dire than Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the Israel-Hamas war.
The US is actively seeking communication with China to prevent a conflict in the Strait. However, this by no means indicates that the situation is completely calm. Lai’s upcoming May 20 inaugural speech and the Philippines’ moves in the South China Sea could be key factors that influence regional security.
Meanwhile, news of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s plan to visit China next month adds an ominous variable in the three-party relations between the US, China and Russia. After all, Putin tends to favor former US president Donald Trump over Biden.
Taiwan should consider embedding itself alongside India in the Indo-Pacific strategy and deepen its cooperation with the South Asian nation.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has promised to raise India’s profile by making it the world’s third-largest economy by 2030 and develop the nation into one of the world’s top five producers of semiconductors.
India declined to join China’s regional trade group — the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership — showing that New Delhi’s Indo-Pacific strategy is one which clearly delineates its relationship with Beijing and creates an Indo-Pacific supply chain that is decoupled from China.
Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy shows the normalized pacing of Taiwan and India’s relationship and is accelerating toward a “sprinting phase.”
Embedding Taiwan within the Indo-Pacific strategy narrative, its ties with India must go hand in hand and launch the start of a new chapter in relations.
Lin Hsiao-chen is an associate professor in Tamkang University’s School of Strategic Studies and an International Commission of Jurists researcher focused on the Supreme Court of India.
Translated by Tim Smith
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not