On Wednesday morning last week, an earthquake off the east coast, measuring 7.2 on the Richter scale, was felt across the country, but Hualien County was hit the worst.
As of Sunday, 13 people have died and more than 1,000 have been injured.
The quake was almost as powerful as 1999’s devastating 921 Earthquake, making it the strongest to strike Taiwan in the past 25 years.
Taiwan’s geographical location is such that it experiences frequent earthquakes that cause losses to property and lives. By withstanding one such test after another, the government and society have learned and strengthened their resilience against disasters. For example, Taiwan has continually enhanced the earthquake resilience of buildings and infrastructure.
The experience of living through many earthquakes and all kinds of natural disasters has raised people’s awareness and ability to guard against and respond to calamities, so that they can react more calmly and quickly.
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and her administration have been steadfastly holding the front line of democracy throughout her eight years in office.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the government’s efforts in combating the virus drew global attention, as did Taiwan’s irreplaceable role in the manufacturing of semiconductors and other high-technology products.
Therefore, the international community again paid close attention when last week’s earthquake struck. Important political figures from nearly 90 countries expressed their condolences within the first few days.
“Japan is willing to provide Taiwan with any necessary assistance,” Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida posted in traditional Chinese characters. His response was an example of the notion that a problem for Taiwan is also a problem for Japan, and a statement of the close relations between the neighboring countries.
The US “stands ready to provide any necessary assistance,” US National Security Council spokeswoman Adrienne Watson said in a statement.
The UK “stands ready to support in any way we can,” British Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs David Cameron wrote on X.
European Council President Charles Michel likewise said that the EU is ready to assist.
In Asia, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr also sent messages of condolence, with Modi writing on X: “We stand in solidarity with the resilient people of Taiwan.”
The international community was impressed by Taiwan’s success in minimizing the effects of the disaster.
The Dalai Lama even sent Tsai a message in which he not only expressed condolences, but also praised Taiwan’s quick response to the earthquake.
International media also reported extensively on the earthquake.
A New York Times report on the day of the quake said that Taiwan has continually updated its earthquake prevention and response measures since the 921 Earthquake that killed nearly 2,500 people.
Meanwhile, the Associated Press and French media also discussed why casualties and losses were relatively low in comparison to similar quakes, saying that this highlights the importance of strict earthquake preparedness.
Taiwan’s resilience to disasters and emergency response has indeed improved. The nation started by coping with the immediate disaster and other countries stepped forward to extend a hand of friendship.
Most of the international community’s messages of condolence have come from democratic allies in the Americas, Europe and Japan, and from countries that have diplomatic relations with Taiwan. During Tsai’s eight years in office, her administration’s foreign policy has stayed firmly on the right track, laying the foundation for mutual assistance and cooperation.
As for China, apart from the standard condolences from its Taiwan Affairs Office, Chinese officials “spoke on Taiwan’s behalf” at a UN meeting by thanking the international community for its concern.
However, even in the wake of the earthquake, Chinese People’s Liberation (PLA) aircraft and ships continued harassing Taiwan’s sea and airspace as if nothing had happened. With China saying one thing and doing another, it is not hard to tell which one is false and which is genuine.
On top of dealing with natural disasters, Taiwanese also face the threat of annexation by its thuggish neighbor, China. From Beijing’s point of view, Taiwan is a key starting point for expanding into the Indo-Pacific region.
On Tuesday last week, US President Joe Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) held a telephone conversation in which Xi said that “the Taiwan question is the first red line that must not be crossed in China-US relations.” As well as testing the US’ bottom line with regard to the Taiwan Strait, these words also reveal the order in which China plans to achieve its external ambitions.
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) visit to China, which started on Monday last week, and his expected second meeting with Xi tomorrow show that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is launching a new pro-unification offensive with a strategy focused on sowing division.
During Ma’s visit, which is completely directed by the Chinese side, all on-the-spot reporting of Ma’s activities is limited to Chinese media and certain outlets in Taiwan. This shows that this visit is a political propaganda show aimed at audiences in the two countries.
Notably, given China’s current poor social and economic situation, the Democratic Progressive Party’s victory in January’s presidential election, along with the disadvantageous situation of various countries’ concerted efforts to contain China, Ma’s acceptance of the CCP’s invitation to visit China shows that he is happy to play the role of a political tool, helping Beijing create the illusion of successfully drawing Taiwan toward unification. At the same time, the CCP is also using Ma to rein in Taiwan’s pan-blue and pan-white political camps and put pressure on the incoming administration of president-elect William Lai (賴清德).
American Institute in Taiwan Chair Laura Rosenberger visited Taiwan from March 31 to Saturday, during which she met with major political parties and politicians.
Her trip was aimed not only at counterbalancing China’s power, but also at strongly supporting Taiwan as it continues to play the important role of an “island of resilience” in the worldwide front of resistance against China.
Meanwhile, China has been increasing its provocations in the South China Sea, East China Sea and other waters, confronting Philippine vessels near the Second Thomas Shoal (Renai Shoal, 仁愛暗沙). These moves have aroused shared vigilance among democratic countries.
Biden, Kishida and Marcos are to attend a summit meeting this week, and the US, Japan, the Philippines and Australia on Sunday conducted naval drills in the region.
The PLA’s preparations for simultaneous operations in the South China Sea, East China Sea and Taiwan Strait has actually accelerated the democracies’ determination to jointly resist China.
Although Xi hoped to use his phone call with Biden to conceal China’s “wolf warrior” diplomacy and create a propaganda promoting the illusion of China and the US jointly managing the Indo-Pacific region, US officials quickly clarified that the US president had again emphasized to his counterpart the importance of maintaining peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait and urged China to abide by the principles of the rule of law and freedom of navigation in the South China Sea.
Biden, who has repeatedly said that the US would defend Taiwan, would not be influenced by Xi’s insistence that “the Taiwan question is the first red line that must not be crossed in China-US relations.”
The US and other major democratic countries have repeatedly stated that the Taiwan Strait must remain peaceful and stable. They are showing the Xi regime that it faces an uncrossable red line in the Taiwan Strait.
As long as we continue to protect democracy and build up our own strength, our international friends and allies will support us in building this “island of resilience.”
Translated by Julian Clegg
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS