Over the past few weeks, the Legislative Yuan has begun reviewing a bill on marine conservation. Some lawmakers believe it could affect the rights of fishers and indigenous people.
The opposite is true.
Promoting marine conservation helps the economies of fishing and indigenous communities and indirectly aids in consolidating national sovereignty.
The most recent environmental sustainability governance goals include an item focused on ecological diversity. The days of looking at environmental and ecological conservation as a target for economic development are over.
Marine conservation laws are the basis of a sustainable marine economy. Government ministries and political parties should all agree on this.
There are five reasons for doing so.
First, conservation could solve the issue of declining resources in the fishing industry.
Regardless of whether they are specialist academics conducting research or fishers out on the water hauling in a catch, all actors believe fishery resources are becoming scarcer. The leading factors for this decline include global warming, marine pollution, the disappearance of aquatic nurseries such as estuarine mangroves and overfishing.
The law must be used as the basis for investing in research and conservation resources and to reduce harm to fishery resources to effectively regenerate them.
Second, there are opportunities to be derived from the blue economy.
Regardless of whether it is through tourism or consumerism, Taiwanese increasingly support products that help with conservation. The Fushan Fisheries Resource Conservation Area (富山護漁區) situated among Taitung County’s indigenous villages is an excellent example.
Due to damage to the marine ecology caused by overfishing, a moratorium was announced in 2005 prohibiting all fishing in the area. This created an ecologically abundant tourist spot in the intertidal zone along Taitung’s coastline.
The conservation effect was not limited to the off-limits zone either — it spread, resulting in the gradual replenishment of fish in other areas. This brought a doubled economic benefit to the indigenous region’s fishing and tourism industries.
Third, work and project opportunities should be expanded for conservationists and researchers.
There are not enough resources available for Taiwan’s marine ecology research and conservation workers — even when they are developing marine energy resources, they lack fundamental scientific data.
Taiwan and its outlying islands are surrounded by water, and there is abundant biological diversity in these waters.
Focusing more on marine ecology research and conservation could advance the quality and quantity of Taiwan’s marine research, subsequently developing production in areas such as underwater acoustics and uncrewed submersibles.
Fourth, conservation helps to consolidate national sovereignty.
The creation of marine sanctuaries is a global trend, yet behind the scenes, it represents an extension of a nation’s sovereignty.
The US’ marine sanctuaries in the Pacific Ocean were conceived partially with this strategy in mind.
Taiwan could consider this path, using ecological conservation values as a means of solidifying its maritime sovereignty.
Fifth, endangered species need saving.
Ecological diversity is an important marker of sustainable development.
Taiwan has already joined the ranks of developed countries. It ought to have and use proactive regenerative policies to bring endemic endangered organisms back from the brink of extinction.
For example, the nation should pay more attention to the biomarker of marine mammals: Of the population of Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins swimming around Taiwan’s waters, there are only about 60, and they are classified as critically endangered.
Taiwan is in dire need of a foundational marine conservation law that could benefit ecological conservation and the marine economy.
Chen Bing-heng is a doctoral candidate in the College of Environmental Studies and Oceanography at National Dong Hwa University.
Translated by Tim Smith
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS