Chinese band crossed a line
The Pingtung County Government’s independent music festival, the Taiwan Music Festival, began on Thursday and ended yesterday. One of the bands set to perform was Chinese indie band Young Dan (回春丹), but the band stepped on a cross-strait landmine when they published a promotional post on social media using the words “Taiwan, China.” The post outraged numerous fans who support Taiwanese sovereignty and led the director of the festival to immediately cancel the band’s scheduled performance.
On Tuesday, when Taiwanese fans’ rage had not yet subsided, a group of fans and spontaneous demonstrators arrived during Young Dan’s performance at Legacy Taipei, holding flags that read “Taiwan independence,” “liberate Hong Kong,” and even “Tibet independence” to peacefully express their position.
Many Chinese bands have performed in Taiwan in recent years, so why has this not happened before?
Chinese bands have always understood to only use the word Taiwan or the name of the city in their posts, such as “Taipei” for example.
They would never stick “China” in it. Young Dan crossed a line, trampling on Taiwanese sovereignty in a situation filled to the brim with a sense of national consciousness.
It is only natural that they would be cast aside by fans and other Taiwanese who possess a fundamental belief of sovereignty.
For people to only use flags to express their demands is the most gentle method of protest possible.
While the situation festered on the Internet, a portion of people only flirting with the concept of sovereignty made irresponsible comments such as: “Politics is politics, music is music,” or: “Saying that Taiwan is a part of China won’t hurt anybody.”
Some people even went so far as to compare the concert protestors to China’s “little pink” Internet nationalists, turning up their noses in contempt. These people are accomplices to unification and are holding back national sovereignty.
We should first focus on supporting Taiwan’s right to sovereignty.
If China was not constantly hoping to forcefully annex and culturally unify with Taiwan, would unification and independence even be a topic of discussion today?
Regardless of which political party you support, no Taiwanese should want Taiwan to be taken advantage of.
Tseng Kuan-ya
Chiayi County
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS