Subjecting criminal suspects to torture during interrogation and parading these actions is frequently seen in China, and now, after the terror attack at Crocus City Hall in Moscow, we are seeing the same thing happening in Russia. The message: State terrorism is legal.
Russian media reported that Russian security forces cut off the ears of the terror suspects during their interrogation, which included other brutal methods such as electrocuting their genitals. This was called “prevention measures” by Russian state media, who broadcast the images and videos.
Who orchestrated all of this? In the regime of Russian President Vladimir Putin it is clear that no individual or institution could take independent decisions and measures on such a sensitive issue. The deaths of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny, Wagner Group head Yevgeny Prigozhin and many others show that today Russia means Putin and Putin means Russia. Putin is the sole conductor.
Putin might be trying to console the relatives of those killed in the attack and ease their anger, but he is also sending a message to his open and secret enemies and showing off his nationalist spirit. The broadcasted images showed that the state has adopted terror against terror and has descended morally to the level of state terrorism. At the same time, it rejects the theory that terrorism is inexcusable.
The difference between the state and the pirate gang when punishing the enemy is that the punishment by the state is usually carried out within the legal order and in accordance with norms. The democratic system reflects not only the will of the majority, but also the protection of minority rights. The greatness of a country is expressed not by daily events, but by not deviating from the law even when dealing with sudden and complicated incidents.
For a statesman, parading torture reflects mental instability. Putin’s mental instability was revealed when he percieved a tip-off from the US about a potential terrorist attack on Moscow as a provocation. After ISIS-K took responsibility for the attack, Putin held Ukraine responsible for the incident.
The source of Putin’s instability might be in the harshness of the Moscow attack; it could be because he failed to successfully decapitate the Ukrainian government despite throwing everything Russia has into a war for three years; it might be the result of the bombs he dropped to protect Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime for 10 years or the pride of his victory in occupying Crimea. Whatever the source, the harm and danger of this mental imbalance is evident.
This latest example of lawlessness from a dictatorial regime could easily encourage other regimes to engage in more brutal actions. Three years ago, Chinese media broadcast on television former Uyghur Regional Education Department director Sattar Sawut and former Regional Political and Legal Affairs Committee deputy secretary Shirzat Bawudun crying and asking for forgiveness for the “criminal” act of separatism. Next time, China might show the torture scenes that preceded their pleading.
One day Saudi Arabia’s Prince Bin Salman might proudly announce that his security forces assassinated and dismembered journalist Jamal Khashoggi in the consulate in Istanbul.
More importantly, this is the instability of the leader of a country with nuclear weapons. This is the imbalance of a leader who declares war, holds grudges and threatens neighbors. Therefore, this imbalance must be felt as soon as possible, it must be announced to other parties that it is felt, and most importantly, this imbalance must be stopped by drawing the necessary lessons. Otherwise, the damage of this imbalance would not remain limited to Ukraine.
Kok Bayraq is a Uighur-American observer.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s