The global artificial intelligence (AI) arms race is heating up, but AI’s development poses risks that governments around the world are seriously concerned about.
The European Parliament recently approved the EU AI Act — the first-ever legal framework on AI — which aims to address the risks of AI, including discrimination, privacy invasion and other potential problems.
AI emotion recognition would be prohibited in workplaces and education institutions, the EU legislation said. High-risk AI practices, such as utilizing AI to filter job applicants, would also be forbidden.
Some argue that applying overly stringent regulations on AI puts obstacles in the way of its development.
However, AI has the potential to cause severe problems just because of one single mistake. A car crash due to an error in a self-driving car is an example.
Underlying moral and ethical issues such as algorithm bias or criminal exploitation of AI technologies remain unresolved.
Deepfakes were originally designed to help complete the signal of an image, but criminals have co-opted the technology for more nefarious uses, such as the creation of fake celebrity porn.
Taiwan is the country most impacted by the dissemination of false information by foreign sources and has topped the Foreign Governments Dissemination of False Information indicator for a decade. With the increase in AI deepfakes, fake videos are everywhere, influencing public opinion and increasing cybersecurity concerns.
This being the case, how are we to ensure a safe AI industry in Taiwan? After all, we know it is easy for people with bad intentions to use AI to achieve their objectives. That poses a threat to our national security.
AI is a double-edged sword. It benefits people, but also has a negative impact on the human world. That is why governments and global institutions are taking steps to regulate AI.
In Australia, the government announced that it would monitor AI to prevent improper content generated by it. In the UK, the government has established the AI Safety Institute, the world’s first AI safety organization.
The EU AI Act, on the other hand is more comprehensive and practical than any other similar existing law or regulations. It would be a stepping stone for Western countries to build a legal framework for AI since the US still has implemented little AI legislation. It is also believed to be effective for countries and industries inside and outside the EU.
Taiwan plays a crucial role in the global information and communications technology supply chain.
It is time for our government to learn from other countries and consider how to legislate AI so that we can ensure the safe and sustainable development of the AI industry in Taiwan.
Dino Wei works in the information technology industry.
Translated by Hsieh Yi-ching
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s