On Wednesday, an earthquake with a magnitude of 7.2 struck Taiwan. The epicenter was 25km south-southest of Hualien County at a depth of 15.5km. It was the largest earthquake to hit the country in 25 years and triggered tsunami warnings in Japan and the Philippines.
The earthquake caused significant damage, and loss of life and injuries, but the extent was relatively controlled. The international community can learn valuable lessons from Taiwan’s efforts in disaster prevention and management. Additionally, the outpouring of international solidarity and support demonstrates that humanity extends beyond national boundaries.
Taiwan, situated in a disaster-prone region, has developed a comprehensive disaster response system emphasizing risk mitigation, preparedness and recovery. There are several key takeaways from Taiwan’s response to the earthquake. A critical component is having an effective early warning system that can minimize casualties by alerting residents before shaking arrives. Infrastructure that can withstand earthquakes plays a crucial role in reducing damage.
Taiwan’s preparedness for earthquakes is considered one of the most advanced in the world.
The country has implemented stringent building codes, established a world-class seismological network and conducted extensive public education campaigns on safety.
The government organizes earthquake drills in schools and workplaces, while earthquake alerts and safety information are broadcast on public media and sent out via mobile texts.
The earthquake tested not only the resilience of physical infrastructure, but also social and political infrastructure. In the face of the disaster, international solidarity quickly emerged, demonstrating that humanity can unite in the face of suffering. Countries around the world offered immediate assistance.
Furthermore, the disaster underscores the importance of international collaboration in disaster mitigation efforts. Taiwan’s expertise in earthquake mitigation technology should be a source of learning for other countries, particularly those in disaster-prone areas. Taiwan’s experience in handling earthquakes can serve as a reference for practices worldwide.
Besides, social media platforms play a significant role in disseminating information and fostering empathy.
Ultimately, the Taiwan earthquake is not just about damage or statistics; it is about how the human spirit responds to the call for action, learning and solidarity.
By drawing lessons from this event, the international community can work toward a future where countries and communities are better prepared, responsive and mutually supportive in the face of natural disasters.
Najamuddin Khairur Rijal is a lecturer in International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s