Discussions about how to use artificial intelligence (AI) to optimize factory productivity, manage traffic flow and in healthcare abound in Taiwan, given the nation’s importance in the field of technology. The topic of AI’s use in the creation of art has not yet been fully fleshed out in Taiwan, although the subject has been hotly debated globally due to concerns about copyrights, loss of creative control and misinformation.
An award-winning artwork by a Fu-Hsin Trade and Art School student last week prompted discussions on social media about whether it was generated by AI and on how the school handled the issue. A student from the school blew the whistle on the creator, saying that AI had been used to produce the vivid image of the mythical Chinese Monkey King. The image won the first prize in the digital drawing category of an art contest organized by the school to celebrate its 67th anniversary.
Fu-Hsin initially ignored the allegation and said the whistle-blower intended to taint the school’s reputation. However, painters and experts in AI-related fields have provided evidence on the painting’s composition and its misuse of perspective. The school revoked the prize after the student admitted to “accidentally” using AI in the process of producing the image, the school said in a statement on Facebook.
It is unimaginable that Fu-Hsin, a prestigious art school that is considered a cradle of art in Taiwan, would make such a mistake.
The creator of the painting apologized for contravening school rules, the statement said. Based on Fu-Hsin’s rules, students are required to sign an affidavit swearing that they have not used AI tools to create their works. The school did not apologize for its neglect in failing to detect the use of AI, but asked social media users to behave properly.
This incident highlighted that most Taiwanese schools, and art schools in particular, are not ready to embrace the AI era. They are struggling to cope with the rapid proliferation of AI applications. They cannot even solve the question of how to discern works generated by AI from those created by humans. Average social media users and painters easily got a sense that the winning image might have been generated by AI, but art experts such as the school’s instructors did not notice anything unusual.
Fu-Hsin’s case offers a glimpse into a society facing growing challenges related to AI. The rise of AI is dramatically changing all aspects of people’s lives. It does not make sense to forbid people from using it to generate text, images or videos. That would only limit creativity and hamper the development of all industries. Instead, people should discuss how best to regulate the use of AI and how to use it appropriately — as a tool or a paintbrush to create art or improve people’s lives, rather than a mastermind of algorithms or a generator of misinformation.
Earlier this year, the EU approved its AI Act, the first of its kind in the world, with the aim of providing AI developers and deployers with clear requirements and obligations regarding specific uses of AI. The measures would guarantee the safety and fundamental rights of people and businesses when it comes to AI, the EU said.
Taiwan began the process of formulating similar AI rules last year, but no details have been finalized. The nation needs to hurry up and finalize AI regulations to protect people’s privacy, security and rights.
A return to power for former US president Donald Trump would pose grave risks to Taiwan’s security, autonomy and the broader stability of the Indo-Pacific region. The stakes have never been higher as China aggressively escalates its pressure on Taiwan, deploying economic, military and psychological tactics aimed at subjugating the nation under Beijing’s control. The US has long acted as Taiwan’s foremost security partner, a bulwark against Chinese expansionism in the region. However, a second Trump presidency could upend decades of US commitments, introducing unpredictability that could embolden Beijing and severely compromise Taiwan’s position. While president, Trump’s foreign policy reflected a transactional
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has prioritized modernizing the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to rival the US military, with many experts believing he would not act on Taiwan until the PLA is fully prepared to confront US forces. At the Chinese Communist Party’s 20th Party Congress in 2022, Xi emphasized accelerating this modernization, setting 2027 — the PLA’s centennial — as the new target, replacing the previous 2035 goal. US intelligence agencies said that Xi has directed the PLA to be ready for a potential invasion of Taiwan by 2027, although no decision on launching an attack had been made. Whether
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.