When a French minister last year compared Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni to the leader of the French far right, the Italian leader rang French President Emmanuel Macron to complain.
Meloni was so incensed that Macron felt compelled to send an emissary to Rome to appease her, two sources with knowledge of the conversations said.
The Italian prime minister’s message to the French leader was clear: She was no Italian version of Marine Le Pen, one of the sources said.
Meloni’s anger illustrates the depth of divisions within Europe’s nationalist right that might stymie its efforts to wield power at an EU level despite record support ahead of European Parliament elections in June, half a dozen sources with knowledge of their parties’ strategy said.
Polls predict that Europe’s nationalist and euroskeptic parties will win a record number of votes in June. Voters are expected to punish mainstream parties for failing to shield households from high inflation, curb immigration and deliver decent housing and healthcare.
A model constructed by the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR), a policy think tank, using polls from EU countries forecast in January that a populist right coalition of the Christian democrats, conservatives and radical right could, in theory, emerge with a ruling majority in the European Parliament for the first time.
The prospect of a single, muscular bloc encompassing the far-right emerging is slim amid stark differences between its leading figures, Meloni and Le Pen, the sources said.
Meloni de facto leads the hard-right European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) grouping within the parliament, while Le Pen is a driving force in the more overtly anti-EU Identity and Democracy (ID) group.
A merger between their two groups at the European Parliament is highly unlikely because Meloni’s strategy, now that she is in power, is to maximize Italian influence within Europe by collaborating with EU institutions, not fighting them, the sources said.
Le Pen, by contrast, is intent on demonstrating that “Macron’s Europe,” as she calls it, is failing common folks — even if she says she no longer advocates a French exit from the EU.
“What Meloni really wants is to form a coalition of the right at the European parliament to be in a pivotal position,” French member of the European Parliament Nicolas Bay said.
His party, Reconquete, a French far-right rival of Le Pen’s, struck an alliance with Meloni last month.
The lack of a single, coherent policy platform would weaken the far right’s influence on matters ranging from trade relations with China to Europe’s response to the war in Ukraine, climate policy and immigration, analysts say.
Influence within the European Parliament is vital for the composition of the European Commission — the bloc’s executive body which also has the responsibility of initiating EU legislation. The legislature has become more fragmented and uncertain as mainstream parties have lost ground in EU elections over the last decade.
Jean-Paul Garraud, the leader of Le Pen’s troops at the European Parliament, accused the ECR of favoring Ukraine joining the EU, the sharing of migrants across European countries and of trade deals that harm Europe’s agricultural sector.
“We have always stood against all these points,” he said.
On their Web site, ECR say they want a Europe that’s “safe and secure,” “an immigration system that works” and “all member states treated equally,” and that they “stand with Ukraine.”
A spokesperson declined further comment.
Across Europe, the far right is gaining momentum.
In France, Le Pen is polling 12 points ahead of Macron, while Germany’s Alternative for Germany party is in second place nationwide. The Dutch Party for Freedom won November last year’s election by a surprise margin, and Portugal’s Chega party this month quadrupled its number of parliamentary seats.
Chega, the Party for Freedom and Alternative for Germany belong to ID, which is dominated by Le Pen’s Rassemblement National party. Surveys show the bloc is third in voting intentions behind the center-right European People’s Party (EPP) and center-left Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats.
Narrowly trailing ID is the Meloni-led ECR, which houses Poland’s former ruling Law and Justice party.
Polls suggest an alliance between the two would leave Europe’s hard right in contention to become the leading political force in the next European parliament, ahead of the conservative EPP, which has dominated it in the past few decades.
That would unleash a political earthquake. Leadership of the EU’s powerful executive, the European Commission, should be handed to the parliament’s largest group.
However, political insiders on both sides of the Alps say Meloni’s decision to keep Le Pen at bay would prevent that.
“There have been positions that did not bring convergence between Le Pen and European conservatives,” Giovanni Donzelli, a senior executive of the Brothers of Italy party and close Meloni confident, said, citing foreign policy and family issues.
Meloni’s rapid ascent to power was closely tied to the transformation of her Brothers of Italy party, which moved into the mainstream without fully repudiating its post-fascist roots.
Since she swept to power in 2022, becoming Italy’s most-right wing leader since wartime dictator Benito Mussolini, she has compared her party to the US Republican Party and Britain’s Conservative Party.
Meloni has during her premiership sought to reassure markets and international partners, adopting a pro-business, pro-trade approach to the economy and offering steadfast support to Ukraine and transatlantic relations.
Rather than bashing the European Commission on Europe’s swelling migrant numbers, Meloni has co-opted the support of its president, Ursula von der Leyen, as she places Italy center stage in Europe’s response to the crisis.
A French diplomat, who asked not to be named because of the sensitivity of the issue, said Meloni’s strategy was to be at the heart of the game in Europe and seek a strong economic portfolio in the next Commission.
Her actions set her apart from Le Pen’s more protectionist rhetoric on the economy as well as the French politician’s past ties to Russia and her more ambiguous support for Ukraine.
On March 24, Le Pen challenged the Italian premier to clarify whether she would back Von der Leyen, a member of the EPP, for a second term.
“I think you will, and by doing so, you will contribute to worsening the policies the people of Europe are suffering from so much,” she told ID delegates in Rome.
ECR cohead Nicola Procaccini told Italian daily Il Tempo that Le Pen’s comments were “inappropriate” and defended cooperation with the EPP as a means of countering Macron and the European left. An ECR spokesperson declined further comment.
While Le Pen’s popularity is fast growing at home, her brand remains toxic among Brussels policymakers and, crucially, among German conservatives, French and Italian diplomatic sources said.
EPP president Manfred Weber has made it clear to Meloni he could not accept an alliance with ECR if it was home to Le Pen and her party, the two diplomatic sources said.
The conservative German lawmaker is in close contact with Meloni to include ECR or parts of it in the wider parliament coalition that would back the next European Commission and its president, they said.
He has set pro-EU and pro-Ukraine conditions for a deal.
A spokesperson for Weber said that as EPP group leader, he was in regular exchange with EU leaders, including Meloni, regardless of their parties.
“The Italian government is involved in the EU in a spirit of cooperation, for example in talks with North African states on the issue of migration or in supporting Ukraine,” he said.
The ECFR said in its January report that an alliance of the EPP and ECR would see a rightward shift in EU decisionmaking on matters such as immigration, climate change and family, but the tack to the right would be less pronounced than it would were the ID in alliance.
Le Pen has rowed back on calls to exit the EU, but remains a fervent euroskeptic. Her party argues for a reform of EU treaties that would deprive the European Commission of its power to initiate legislation and turn the EU into a loose cooperation of member states.
Three diplomats and experts said Meloni was probably calculating how she would obtain the greatest leverage on the shape of the next European Commission.
Le Pen’s Rassemblement National party is likely to have a larger contingent of European lawmakers than Meloni’s party. If they were in ECR, the Italian leader would lose influence.
Le Pen “is a rival. She has no interest in letting the wolf into the fold,” said Gilles Ivaldi, a specialist in European far-right parties at the Paris Institute of Political Studies.
Meloni’s ECR group has held talks with Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, who maintains close links to Moscow, two European diplomats and an ECR source said.
Orban’s inclusion would bring more heft to ECR without jeopardizing her leadership.
Le Pen might find herself winning the biggest share of the vote in France, but confined to the sidelines in Brussels and deprived of any meaningful power at the EU level.
Even so, analysts said that many French voters would see a strong Le Pen showing through a national lens.
“This would set the tone for the 2027 presidential election and could establish Le Pen as the potential next French president,” researchers at the ECFR think tank wrote.
Recently, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) hastily pushed amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) through the Legislative Yuan, sparking widespread public concern. The legislative process was marked by opaque decisionmaking and expedited proceedings, raising alarms about its potential impact on the economy, national defense, and international standing. Those amendments prioritize short-term political gains at the expense of long-term national security and development. The amendments mandate that the central government transfer about NT$375.3 billion (US$11.47 billion) annually to local governments. While ostensibly aimed at enhancing local development, the lack
Former US president Jimmy Carter’s legacy regarding Taiwan is a complex tapestry woven with decisions that, while controversial, were instrumental in shaping the nation’s path and its enduring relationship with the US. As the world reflects on Carter’s life and his recent passing at the age of 100, his presidency marked a transformative era in Taiwan-US-China relations, particularly through the landmark decision in 1978 to formally recognize the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the sole legal government of China, effectively derecognizing the Republic of China (ROC) based in Taiwan. That decision continues to influence geopolitical dynamics and Taiwan’s unique
Having enjoyed contributing regular essays to the Liberty Times and Taipei Times now for several years, I feel it is time to pull back. As some of my readers know, I have enjoyed a decades-long relationship with Taiwan. My most recent visit was just a few months ago, when I was invited to deliver a keynote speech at a major conference in Taipei. Unfortunately, my trip intersected with Double Ten celebrations, so I missed the opportunity to call on friends in government, as well as colleagues in the new AIT building, that replaced the old Xin-yi Road complex. I have
Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) — who once endured the hardship of living under an authoritarian political system and arduously led a quiet revolution — once said: “Democratic issues must be solved with democratic means.” Today, as Taiwanese are faced with the malicious subversion of our country’s democratic constitutional order, we must not panic. Rather, we should start by taking democratic action to rescue the Constitutional Court. As Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) leads the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) in strangling Taiwan’s judiciary and depriving individuals of the right to recall and development, Taiwanese