The summer before last, I was getting ready to leave my family on holiday in France while I came home to England. My children, who were seven and four, held on to me tightly, looking pale and serious. However, they were too frightened to protest, the way they would have done if I had been leaving them with a babysitter for the evening. We all knew there was something wrong with me, and I was heading off into the unknown.
About eight weeks earlier, my face had become swollen and puffy. Then my neck followed, and eventually my whole upper body. I looked weird, I felt faint and I could hardly stay awake. I was 39.
The day before we had set off on that holiday, an ultrasound had found a large, sinister mass, half-hidden behind my ribs. Ultrasound cannot see through bone, the sonographer told me, but I needed a scan that could, and quickly.
The National Health Service promises that cancer tests take place within two weeks — an impressively short time, until you are in it, waiting to know if you are going to live or die. We decided we would still go on our holiday rather than spend those two weeks waiting around at home. It would be fun and distracting. Also, there was another reason: It suddenly felt urgent to make nice memories for the kids. Even though I looked so strange, I wanted to make sure there were plenty of photos with me in them, instead of staying behind the camera as usual.
In quiet moments, my husband and I tried to think ahead. If I was dying, should I write cards for all the children’s future birthdays? Was there anything I could leave behind that would make things better for them? Everyone knows there is no “better” when you lose your mum. I kept thinking about interviews I had read with people like Eddie Izzard and Marco Pierre White, on whom that experience had left a scar that would never heal.
When my children were babies, I had read every book about parenting I could find in an effort to avoid fucking them up, and here I was, about to do it anyway, and in the worst possible way.
The call came, and I took an early flight back. It turned out I had a kind of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and that large mass, about the size of a mug of tea, was almost completely blocking the vein that drains the top half of my body into my heart. That autumn I spent eight weeks in hospital, cumulatively: six rounds of chemo, each one a six-day stay, and four emergency admissions, but I was lucky. A year and a half later I am still here, not only in remission but 100 percent well. The treatment gave me an early menopause, and my previously straight hair, which all fell out, has come back curly. Otherwise, you would never know it had happened.
Kate, Princess of Wales has not said what kind of cancer she has, and nor is it any of our business. However, in her video message, she suggests the prognosis is good. I hope, a year or two from now, she is like me, looking back with horror and asking: Did that actually happen to me?
I still wonder how much it affected my children. Most of the time they seem completely unscathed; other times I am not sure.
A Macmillan volunteer gave us two great unexpected pieces of advice about talking to kids about cancer: Make sure they realize it is not their fault, and make sure they know they cannot catch it.
Apparently, those worries are common, but adults do not usually realize it. Another good bit of advice from a neighbor, a psychotherapist, was to give the children something active to do; going through a potentially traumatic situation is much worse when you feel like a helpless passenger. It was not easy — we were all pretty helpless — but a sponsored walk for Macmillan gave them a sense of making a difference.
There are not many things you could learn from having cancer, apart from how awful it is. However, it does help you to focus on what is important. Now I have been given my life back — potentially decades of it — I think a lot about what I should do.
Kate probably has to put up with more rubbish than most of us, especially so in the past few weeks. I hope, in the middle of everything that is grim about this experience, it brings her some comforting clarity about what actually matters.
Marina McIntyre is deputy audience editor of the Guardian.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS