An apparent food poisoning outbreak at a restaurant in Taipei that resulted in two sudden deaths and five people having to be treated in intensive care units has made headlines over the past few days. Investigations and testing confirmed it to be the first instance of bongkrek acid poisoning in Taiwan.
Bongkrek acid is a rare toxin produced by contamination with a bacterium, especially in fermented coconut or corn food products, and a mere milligram of the colorless and tasteless substance is deadly.
While specialists and officials are trying to identify the source of the deadly toxin, and prosecutors and police are collecting information and questioning restaurant personnel, it is a shame that some politicians and critics are quick to point fingers.
As of yesterday, 25 customers of Malaysian restaurant Polam Kopitiam (寶林茶室) in the food court of Taipei’s Far Eastern Department Store Xinyi A13 have reported falling ill after eating there — most of them ate a stir-fried flat rice noodle dish — between March 19 and last Sunday.
Two men died two days and a week, respectively, after eating at the restaurant, and five other people were hospitalized under intensive care.
The issue first grabbed public attention on Tuesday after the Taipei Department of Health received reports from three other hospitals about cases possibly linked to the restaurant, and an on-site inspection by Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control officials was conducted that day, while the restaurant franchise was ordered to suspend all operations.
With the help of healthcare professionals, public health experts and toxicologists, an impromptu meeting of specialists convened by the Ministry of Health and Welfare on Wednesday evening determined bongkrek acid to be the likely cause, and they later confirmed that blood from the dead and hospitalized people all tested positive for bongkrek acid, marking the first cases ever in Taiwan.
As the investigation progressed, a pan-blue camp local newspaper was quick to blame the central government led by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), publishing an editorial on Wednesday claiming that Taiwan is in a state of anarchy, as people can die from a meal at a food court and a foster child can die after being abused by a caregiver; while other pan-blue camp politicians blamed the central government for stepping in too late on Wednesday, when the first death occurred on Sunday.
DPP city councilors and legislators pointed their finger back at the Taipei City Government led by Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), accusing the city government of reporting the cases to the central government too late and passing the buck; while pan-green camp critics questioned Chiang’s ability to deal with food safety, child abuse and other public security problems.
However, the public is not interested in whether the central or the local government should apologize at this time, but is more eager to understand how the incident occurred and if it has affected other food products.
The answers can be better provided by the central and local governments working together efficiently and professionally.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS