An apparent food poisoning outbreak at a restaurant in Taipei that resulted in two sudden deaths and five people having to be treated in intensive care units has made headlines over the past few days. Investigations and testing confirmed it to be the first instance of bongkrek acid poisoning in Taiwan.
Bongkrek acid is a rare toxin produced by contamination with a bacterium, especially in fermented coconut or corn food products, and a mere milligram of the colorless and tasteless substance is deadly.
While specialists and officials are trying to identify the source of the deadly toxin, and prosecutors and police are collecting information and questioning restaurant personnel, it is a shame that some politicians and critics are quick to point fingers.
As of yesterday, 25 customers of Malaysian restaurant Polam Kopitiam (寶林茶室) in the food court of Taipei’s Far Eastern Department Store Xinyi A13 have reported falling ill after eating there — most of them ate a stir-fried flat rice noodle dish — between March 19 and last Sunday.
Two men died two days and a week, respectively, after eating at the restaurant, and five other people were hospitalized under intensive care.
The issue first grabbed public attention on Tuesday after the Taipei Department of Health received reports from three other hospitals about cases possibly linked to the restaurant, and an on-site inspection by Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control officials was conducted that day, while the restaurant franchise was ordered to suspend all operations.
With the help of healthcare professionals, public health experts and toxicologists, an impromptu meeting of specialists convened by the Ministry of Health and Welfare on Wednesday evening determined bongkrek acid to be the likely cause, and they later confirmed that blood from the dead and hospitalized people all tested positive for bongkrek acid, marking the first cases ever in Taiwan.
As the investigation progressed, a pan-blue camp local newspaper was quick to blame the central government led by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), publishing an editorial on Wednesday claiming that Taiwan is in a state of anarchy, as people can die from a meal at a food court and a foster child can die after being abused by a caregiver; while other pan-blue camp politicians blamed the central government for stepping in too late on Wednesday, when the first death occurred on Sunday.
DPP city councilors and legislators pointed their finger back at the Taipei City Government led by Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), accusing the city government of reporting the cases to the central government too late and passing the buck; while pan-green camp critics questioned Chiang’s ability to deal with food safety, child abuse and other public security problems.
However, the public is not interested in whether the central or the local government should apologize at this time, but is more eager to understand how the incident occurred and if it has affected other food products.
The answers can be better provided by the central and local governments working together efficiently and professionally.
As the war in Burma stretches into its 76th year, China continues to play both sides. Beijing backs the junta, which seized power in the 2021 coup, while also funding some of the resistance groups fighting the regime. Some suggest that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is hedging his bets, positioning China to side with the victors regardless of the outcome. However, a more accurate explanation is that China is acting pragmatically to safeguard its investments and ensure the steady flow of natural resources and energy for its economy. China’s primary interest is stability and supporting the junta initially seemed like the best
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
Numerous expert analyses characterize today’s US presidential election as a risk for Taiwan, given that the two major candidates, US Vice President Kamala Harris and former US president Donald Trump, are perceived to possess divergent foreign policy perspectives. If Harris is elected, many presume that the US would maintain its existing relationship with Taiwan, as established through the American Institute in Taiwan, and would continue to sell Taiwan weapons and equipment to help it defend itself against China. Under the administration of US President Joe Biden, whose political views Harris shares, the US on Oct. 25 authorized arms transfers to Taiwan, another
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
RSS