Stores should not raise the prices of their products, Minister of Economic Affairs Wang Mei-hua (王美花) said in anticipation of a rise in commodity prices triggered by the electricity rate increase next month.
This was surely a good statement; it would be great if all industries and businesses could listen to the minister’s words and meet her expectation by creating a peaceful and happy country.
However, this is likely to fall short of her expectations.
Before next month even arrives, the famous Japanese ramen restaurant chain Ichiran already announced that it would raise the price of its noodles.
Theoretically, if energy cost accounts for 10 percent of the total production cost of a product, then a 10 percent electricity price hike would only increase the total production cost by 1 percent.
However, this is a purely mathematical analysis and is not the case in practice.
Experience tells us that an increase in fuel and electricity prices would lead to a price hike in everything, because fuel and electricity prices serve as price indicators. There are three potential scenarios below:
First, the prices of energy-related products would certainly go up.
However, the rate of increase is not only based on the electricity price hike, but also on the cumulative effect of changes in the production chain as a whole.
Upstream and midstream businesses accumulate or even add the costs of raw materials, energy and labor, and then pass them on to the downstream businesses.
Simply put, a bakery would not only consider the electricity costs of baking, but also the raw materials needed, such as flour, eggs and even packaging materials, the prices of which all go up.
As a result, consumers are left to suffer in silence, as all prices increase.
Second, businesses not directly affected by electricity costs, such as the parking lots of Taiwan High Speed Rail stations, would also have to raise prices, due to the increase in its operators’ expenditures.
The consideration of operators in raising their prices is not an increase in direct production costs, but the need to satisfy their livelihood and maintain their operational needs.
Even the prices of fruit and vegetables might have to go up, because farmers have to make a living too. When their home electricity bills go up, they would of course raise the prices of the produce they sell.
Third, as for socio-psychological factors, the public perception would be that if the government takes the lead in raising prices, industry would follow suit.
When public transportation fares go up, it is more likely that this would have a significant impact on overall price hikes in the economy.
If a price hike is reasonable, the public has no choice but to accept it.
Still, hopefuly the government keeps a strict eye on the situation and those taking advantage of the opportunity to inflate their prices, so as to minimize the pain felt by the public due to rising electricity rates.
Chen Wen-ching works in environmental services.
Translated by Eddy Chang
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
Pat Gelsinger took the reins as Intel CEO three years ago with hopes of reviving the US industrial icon. He soon made a big mistake. Intel had a sweet deal going with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the giant manufacturer of semiconductors for other companies. TSMC would make chips that Intel designed, but could not produce and was offering deep discounts to Intel, four people with knowledge of the agreement said. Instead of nurturing the relationship, Gelsinger — who hoped to restore Intel’s own manufacturing prowess — offended TSMC by calling out Taiwan’s precarious relations with China. “You don’t want all of
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
In a recent essay in Foreign Affairs, titled “The Upside on Uncertainty in Taiwan,” Johns Hopkins University professor James B. Steinberg makes the argument that the concept of strategic ambiguity has kept a tenuous peace across the Taiwan Strait. In his piece, Steinberg is primarily countering the arguments of Tufts University professor Sulmaan Wasif Khan, who in his thought-provoking new book The Struggle for Taiwan does some excellent out-of-the-box thinking looking at US policy toward Taiwan from 1943 on, and doing some fascinating “what if?” exercises. Reading through Steinberg’s comments, and just starting to read Khan’s book, we could already sense that