South Korea’s Taiwan policy
South Korea’s 22nd legislative elections are about to get under way. A few days ago, Lee Jae-myung, chairman of South Korea’s largest opposition party, the Democratic Party of Korea, criticized South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol during a campaign rally.
Among other policy issues, his doubts over Seoul’s foreign policy toward Taiwan were also front and center, sparking widespread discussion inside and outside the country.
Lee talked about the Yoon administration’s foreign policy actions toward Taiwan over the past two years, saying they have caused massive harm to South Korea. He added that Yoon had incessantly invited China’s ire, leading to a massive widening in the trade deficit between the two nations.
Lee’s speech reflects the internal divisions of South Korea’s Taiwan policy. On the one hand, some South Koreans believe that their country should maintain friendly relations with China. On the other hand, there are South Koreans who advocate forging ahead with far more active measures in international affairs.
Regardless of who is elected to the legislature, South Korea’s Taiwan policy is sure to face new challenges and opportunities.
Lee Che-yu
Taipei
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
In competitive sports, the narrative surrounding transgender athletes is often clouded by misconceptions and prejudices. Critics sometimes accuse transgender athletes of “gaming the system” to gain an unfair advantage, perpetuating the stereotype that their participation undermines the integrity of competition. However, this perspective not only ignores the rigorous efforts transgender athletes invest to meet eligibility standards, but also devalues their personal and athletic achievements. Understanding the gap between these stereotypes and the reality of individual efforts requires a deeper examination of societal bias and the challenges transgender athletes face. One of the most pervasive arguments against the inclusion of transgender athletes
When viewing Taiwan’s political chaos, I often think of several lines from Incantation, a poem by the winner of the 1980 Nobel Prize in Literature, Czeslaw Milosz: “Beautiful and very young are Philo-Sophia, and poetry, her ally in the service of the good... Their friendship will be glorious, their time has no limit, their enemies have delivered themselves to destruction.” Milosz wrote Incantation when he was a professor of Slavic Studies at the University of California, Berkeley. He firmly believed that Poland would rise again under a restored democracy and liberal order. As one of several self-exiled or expelled poets from
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
RSS