South Korea’s Taiwan policy
South Korea’s 22nd legislative elections are about to get under way. A few days ago, Lee Jae-myung, chairman of South Korea’s largest opposition party, the Democratic Party of Korea, criticized South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol during a campaign rally.
Among other policy issues, his doubts over Seoul’s foreign policy toward Taiwan were also front and center, sparking widespread discussion inside and outside the country.
Lee talked about the Yoon administration’s foreign policy actions toward Taiwan over the past two years, saying they have caused massive harm to South Korea. He added that Yoon had incessantly invited China’s ire, leading to a massive widening in the trade deficit between the two nations.
Lee’s speech reflects the internal divisions of South Korea’s Taiwan policy. On the one hand, some South Koreans believe that their country should maintain friendly relations with China. On the other hand, there are South Koreans who advocate forging ahead with far more active measures in international affairs.
Regardless of who is elected to the legislature, South Korea’s Taiwan policy is sure to face new challenges and opportunities.
Lee Che-yu
Taipei
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS