The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “fake democracy” has become notorious around the globe, especially in the governance of Hong Kong, although the CCP remains in denial.
From a 50-year governance model of “one country, two systems” implemented in 1997 to the new Article 23 of the Hong Kong Basic Law, the CCP has been slowly eroding Hong Kong’s democracy and competitiveness. We might learn more lessons and reflections from the example of Mount Zero Books (見山書店).
Mount Zero Books is a small art bookshop in Sheung Wan (上環), Hong Kong. However, with long-term anonymous complaints and the government’s inexplicable warnings, the bookstore has announced that it is to close by the end of this month.
It is not big news, but anyone with a discerning eye can easily see that the situation of the bookstore is a microcosm of Hong Kong, showing that the CCP’s authoritarianism has infiltrated every nook and cranny.
The implementation of Article 23, including the “national security law,” not only covers treason, sedition and state secrets, but also allows trials to be held behind closed doors.
The police can detain a suspect for 16 days before prosecution, and people found guilty of treason and sedition might be sentenced to life in prison.
Only time will tell how much impact the law will have in Hong Kong. The closing of Mount Zero Books is just one case, and Hong Kongers are concerned about the possibility of losing their competitiveness after already losing their democracy.
Mount Zero Books is a microcosm of Hong Kong, and Hong Kong is a harbinger of what could happen in Taiwan.
Li Kuan-long is a lecturer at Cheng Shiu University’s Center for General Education.
Translated by Chien Yan-ru
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
In competitive sports, the narrative surrounding transgender athletes is often clouded by misconceptions and prejudices. Critics sometimes accuse transgender athletes of “gaming the system” to gain an unfair advantage, perpetuating the stereotype that their participation undermines the integrity of competition. However, this perspective not only ignores the rigorous efforts transgender athletes invest to meet eligibility standards, but also devalues their personal and athletic achievements. Understanding the gap between these stereotypes and the reality of individual efforts requires a deeper examination of societal bias and the challenges transgender athletes face. One of the most pervasive arguments against the inclusion of transgender athletes
When viewing Taiwan’s political chaos, I often think of several lines from Incantation, a poem by the winner of the 1980 Nobel Prize in Literature, Czeslaw Milosz: “Beautiful and very young are Philo-Sophia, and poetry, her ally in the service of the good... Their friendship will be glorious, their time has no limit, their enemies have delivered themselves to destruction.” Milosz wrote Incantation when he was a professor of Slavic Studies at the University of California, Berkeley. He firmly believed that Poland would rise again under a restored democracy and liberal order. As one of several self-exiled or expelled poets from
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in