It has been reported that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has triggered a battle for water between Chiayi and Yunlin counties, as the company is planning to build a factory in Chiayi County, but it has to transfer water from the Hushan Reservoir (湖山水庫) in Yunlin County, which has led to a backlash from Yunlin residents.
It was reported that even deep wells are failing to pump water in southern Taiwan, while Kaohsiung and Pingtung County are currently competing for water supply.
TSMC is often praised in Taiwan as the “sacred mountain protecting the country” and all local governments nationwide are eager for its investment.
LACK OF WATER
This highlights the predicament of insufficient water resources in many areas.
The Reclaimed Water Resources Development Act (再生水資源發展條例) and the Regulations on Governing the Developer’s Use of Reclaimed Water (開發單位使用再生水辦法) came into effect on Feb. 1, making it mandatory for an industrial water user with a planned water consumption of 20,000m3 or more per day, to reclaim at least half of the water used.
However, reclaimed water plants are unevenly distributed and they cannot supply enough water.
Even though the Cabinet has approved the construction of 11 reclaimed water plants, none of them are in Chiayi or Yunlin counties.
Chiayi County uses about 300,000 tonnes of water per day, including 110,000 tonnes from the Tsengwen Reservoir (曾文水庫) in the county and the Wushantou Reservoir (烏山頭水庫) in Tainan.
Yunlin County uses about 250,000 tonnes of water per day.
In addition to the Hushan Reservoir, Yunlin County also heavily relies on groundwater.
UNSUITABLE
Due to subsidence, the use of groundwater would have to be reduced, so both counties are not very suitable for large-scale users of water.
Water resources are considered national resources and water resource allocation has become the norm.
Since the authorities are facing difficulties opening new reservoirs, they have no choice but to strengthen such allocation.
TSMC is unable to use enough reclaimed water because the government does not have any reclaimed water source in the region, so it has no choice but to use water from the Hushan Reservoir, but the protests in Yunlin County should still be carefully responded to.
When the amount of available water is poor, the county’s own water use should be the priority.
DISSATISFACTION
As TSMC could have chosen either Chiayi County or Yunlin County, the losing county’s dissatisfaction is understandable, but all local governments need to speed up the planning and construction of reclaimed water plants, so they no longer have to wait for the Cabinet to favor them.
With sources of reclaimed water being an incentive, large-scale water users would surely then invest in the region.
Taking into account water safety and environmental justice, TSMC and other major profitable electronics companies should be required to build their own reclaimed water plants.
With the efficiency of the private sector, it would be possible to utilize reclaimed water much more quickly this way.
Chang Yen-ming is a former section head at the Water Resources Agency.
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS