Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear.
In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.”
That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald.
The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under international law, the article says. The interesting point is that this appears to be a recent change.
Denmark’s new practice of registering Taiwanese as Chinese illustrates how exposed and vulnerable Taiwan is to the seemingly mundane policies of other countries. These procedures are implemented even though they risk following a Chinese “salami-slicing” tactic whereby the nuanced “one China” policies of different nations slowly line up with Beijing’s “one China” principle.
The key difference between the Chinese “principle” and nation’s “policies” is that the former says that Taiwan is a part of China, while that is not the case for the policies implemented by countries around the world.
Much like Denmark, Norway registers Taiwanese as Chinese. In Norway, Taiwanese still have all the formal rights they previously enjoyed, and then the question is whether nationality is just an emotional want. The argument might go that Taiwanese might be listed as “Chinese,” but they are still treated as Taiwanese. In Denmark as well, Taiwanese appear to keep all of the rights that they previously had.
However, upholding formal rights does not excuse a policy that undermines the self-determination for the 24 million people of Taiwan.
Denmark’s actual “one China” policy simply states that it recognizes China and not Taiwan. Therefore, Denmark does not have diplomatic relations with Taiwan. Nevertheless, it maintains and develops economic and cultural relations with Taiwan. The current interpretation of this policy is that Taiwan is not considered a part of China.
By registering Taiwanese as Chinese, this previous interpretation might have changed. It is not only civil registrations that reveal Denmark’s casual mindset.
The Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs Web site says that in China, Denmark maintains representation in Beijing, Guangzhou, Shanghai and Taipei.
Denmark is known internationally for its ethical foreign policies and strong stances on human rights. This can now be questioned. The risk is that other EU countries would adopt similar policies and create long-term problems for Taiwan and its 24 million citizens to freely determine their future. Taiwan cannot fight China alone.
We live in a time in history when everyone needs to take sides on questions of democracy and human rights. Denmark is strong in its opposition to Russia as demonstrated by impressive support for Ukraine, but are its values equally robust when it comes to China?
Michael Danielsen is chairman of Taiwan Corner.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
RSS