On Thursday last week, a magnitude 5.3 earthquake hit Ibaraki Prefecture in Japan. It was not a massive quake, but Japanese media have been following the aftermath closely, as the nation’s first large nuclear power plant (Tokai No. 2 Power Station) is near the earthquake’s epicenter. Only one reactor is left there, and it has stopped functioning since the 2011 earthquake and tsunami in the Tohoku area.
The Tokai No. 2 Power Station was commissioned in 1978, the same year that Taiwan’s Jinshan Nuclear Power Plant was commissioned. The two share quite a few similarities. Tokai No. 2 is the only nuclear power plant in the Greater Tokyo Area. In the middle of 2018 — 40 years after the plant was commissioned — Japan’s Nuclear Regulation Authority approved its reactivation.
The application for its extension was swiftly approved within a year, and a 20-year license was issued.
However, the plan to reactivate and extend the plant’s life did not go smoothly. As the facility is in the Greater Tokyo Area, about 960,000 people live within a 30km radius from the facility. Japanese law states that reactivating the plant requires the approvals not only of residents of Tokai Village in Ibaraki, but also the surrounding five cities.
The operator of the nuclear power plant had to work hard on its safety measures to earn the public’s trust and support. Yet, after two-and-a-half years, residents still had doubts. The extension plan could not be put into practice without the support of the public.
The Tokai No. 2 Power Station could not be reactivated and its extension plan was abandoned, because the facility is in a densely populated and earthquake-prone area. The operation would cause enormous distress and anxiety to nearby residents.
In Taiwan, there are three nuclear power plants close to Taipei, which is also an earthquake-prone area.
When it comes to debating whether Taiwan’s nuclear power plants should be reactivated, we could observe the Japanese protocols. That is, once a plan has been drafted, it must be approved by greater Taipei residents. If concerns about its safety issue are raised, the plan should be abandoned.
It is worth noting that after a magnitude 7.5 earthquake struck Ishikawa Prefecture at the beginning of this year, plans to reactivate a nuclear power plant ran into severe public opposition.
A survey conducted by the Mainichi Shimbun showed that 45 percent of respondents were against the plant’s reactivation, while 36 percent supported it. It was the first time within two years that more people opposed rather than supported a plant’s reactivation.
Japan’s case provides a lesson — from the way the government tried to extend a nuclear power plant’s service life, but was denied, to how Japanese’s perception about nuclear power plants shifted after an earthquake.
Some people in Taiwan have been advocating for the reactivation or extension of nuclear power plants. They also believe that the nation should rely more on nuclear energy. They must consider Japan’s case and think again.
Chen Kuan-lin is a research manager from Taipei.
Translated by Emma Liu
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS