The significant movement of laborers from Indonesia to Taiwan is closely linked to the economic downturn that affected Indonesia in 1998. Consequently, a significant proportion of Indonesians found themselves jobless and opted to seek employment abroad. Taiwan was a favored choice for people seeking employment because of its high demand for workers, especially in the industrial sector.
As of June last year, a total of 135,791 Indonesian migrant workers have been sent abroad, Indonesian Migrant Workers Protection Agency (BP2MI) data showed. This included 77,350 individuals working in the formal sector and 58,441 individuals working in the informal sector. Taiwan is the top destination for Indonesian migrant workers from January to June last year, with 33,639 workers.
An essential factor of this occurrence is the impression of Taiwan as a favorable destination for these professionals to attain success. There are many stories of success among migrant workers in Taiwan, with many buying homes and setting up businesses in Indonesia after returning from Taiwan. Nevertheless, there are other occasions when some face adversity and subsequently return to Indonesia without any accomplishments.
There is an interesting article by Randy Mulyanto, titled: “Indonesian migrant workers in Taiwan face struggles, discrimination,” published in the South China Morning Post. The story is about a female Indonesian migrant worker who faced unfortunate circumstances in Taiwan. The promises given to her by the labor agency in Indonesia were inconsistent with the real situation. She faced adverse conditions in her work, where the majority of employees were men and she was the only female.
The narrative of the article is interesting, saying: “Taiwan is not as beautiful as the profile picture on Facebook”. The author says that this issue is not exclusive to a single migrant worker, but it is likely that many have encountered similar situations.
I am curious about the specific involvement of the Indonesian government, particularly the BP2MI, in collaborating with Taiwan’s representatives, such as the Taipei Economic and Trade Office (TETO) in Indonesia, to address this issue.
The key factor in addressing this matter is undoubtedly the establishment of a strong and efficient coordination mechanism between the two organizations involved, as well as conducting thorough verification of all labor distributors to obtain validation from both institutions.
Many unscrupulous labor brokers, who bypass official procedures, exploit the strong interest of potential migrant workers to go to Taiwan, Mulyanto said. These brokers entice and deceive prospective workers with false promises, taking advantage of their vulnerability.
An optimal resolution could be collaboration between BP2MI and TETO to establish a comprehensive standardized process for labor channeling companies. These companies should only be authorized to recruit migrant workers for Taiwan if they are duly registered with BP2MI.
It is crucial to establish clear regulations regarding the procedure of sending legal workers to Taiwan, through the collaboration between BP2MI and TETO.
Furthermore, it is essential to widely publicize this process through Indonesian media to reduce the chances of unethical labor brokers taking advantage of the situation.
Effective collaboration between BP2MI and TETO could prevent the emergence of distressing narratives concerning Indonesian migrant workers in Taiwan.
M. Syaprin Zahidi is a senior lecturer in the Department of International Relations at the University of Muhammadiyah Malang and is a doctoral student at Ghazali Shafie Graduate School of Government at the Universiti Utara Malaysia.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS