The significant movement of laborers from Indonesia to Taiwan is closely linked to the economic downturn that affected Indonesia in 1998. Consequently, a significant proportion of Indonesians found themselves jobless and opted to seek employment abroad. Taiwan was a favored choice for people seeking employment because of its high demand for workers, especially in the industrial sector.
As of June last year, a total of 135,791 Indonesian migrant workers have been sent abroad, Indonesian Migrant Workers Protection Agency (BP2MI) data showed. This included 77,350 individuals working in the formal sector and 58,441 individuals working in the informal sector. Taiwan is the top destination for Indonesian migrant workers from January to June last year, with 33,639 workers.
An essential factor of this occurrence is the impression of Taiwan as a favorable destination for these professionals to attain success. There are many stories of success among migrant workers in Taiwan, with many buying homes and setting up businesses in Indonesia after returning from Taiwan. Nevertheless, there are other occasions when some face adversity and subsequently return to Indonesia without any accomplishments.
There is an interesting article by Randy Mulyanto, titled: “Indonesian migrant workers in Taiwan face struggles, discrimination,” published in the South China Morning Post. The story is about a female Indonesian migrant worker who faced unfortunate circumstances in Taiwan. The promises given to her by the labor agency in Indonesia were inconsistent with the real situation. She faced adverse conditions in her work, where the majority of employees were men and she was the only female.
The narrative of the article is interesting, saying: “Taiwan is not as beautiful as the profile picture on Facebook”. The author says that this issue is not exclusive to a single migrant worker, but it is likely that many have encountered similar situations.
I am curious about the specific involvement of the Indonesian government, particularly the BP2MI, in collaborating with Taiwan’s representatives, such as the Taipei Economic and Trade Office (TETO) in Indonesia, to address this issue.
The key factor in addressing this matter is undoubtedly the establishment of a strong and efficient coordination mechanism between the two organizations involved, as well as conducting thorough verification of all labor distributors to obtain validation from both institutions.
Many unscrupulous labor brokers, who bypass official procedures, exploit the strong interest of potential migrant workers to go to Taiwan, Mulyanto said. These brokers entice and deceive prospective workers with false promises, taking advantage of their vulnerability.
An optimal resolution could be collaboration between BP2MI and TETO to establish a comprehensive standardized process for labor channeling companies. These companies should only be authorized to recruit migrant workers for Taiwan if they are duly registered with BP2MI.
It is crucial to establish clear regulations regarding the procedure of sending legal workers to Taiwan, through the collaboration between BP2MI and TETO.
Furthermore, it is essential to widely publicize this process through Indonesian media to reduce the chances of unethical labor brokers taking advantage of the situation.
Effective collaboration between BP2MI and TETO could prevent the emergence of distressing narratives concerning Indonesian migrant workers in Taiwan.
M. Syaprin Zahidi is a senior lecturer in the Department of International Relations at the University of Muhammadiyah Malang and is a doctoral student at Ghazali Shafie Graduate School of Government at the Universiti Utara Malaysia.
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
To The Honorable Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜): We would like to extend our sincerest regards to you for representing Taiwan at the inauguration of US President Donald Trump on Monday. The Taiwanese-American community was delighted to see that Taiwan’s Legislative Yuan speaker not only received an invitation to attend the event, but successfully made the trip to the US. We sincerely hope that you took this rare opportunity to share Taiwan’s achievements in freedom, democracy and economic development with delegations from other countries. In recent years, Taiwan’s economic growth and world-leading technology industry have been a source of pride for Taiwanese-Americans.
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS