No more plastic lanterns
On Sunday mornings, I often take a walk on the beach in the countryside. The air is always fresh. As I walk, I often pick up garbage that drifts ashore. Today, I found an unusual piece of garbage: an extensive piece of nylon with a long string. It was a sky lantern.
In northern Taiwan, Pingsi (平溪) in New Taipei City is where sky lanterns are released. The town is close to Taiwan proper’s northeast coast. It might be unlikely for fallen sky lanterns to drift to the north coast, but due to the tides and waves, it was not entirely impossible. Judging from the remaining parts, it did not look like an ordinary sky lantern from Pingsi. Perhaps it was from Shihmen (石門) or Jinshan (金山). It should be emphasized that if this piece of garbage had not been made of plastic, it could have decomposed naturally, rather than drifting into the ocean and becoming an environmental problem.
Therefore, it is strongly advised that all sky lanterns be made of wax paper. No plastic materials should be used in the process. What is best for the environment should be considered first. Even if the cost were to drastically increase, we should use bamboo sticks as the lantern frame. Releasing sky lanterns is an act of praying for good luck and safety. If people could spend a little more money for the sake of the environment, they would certainly be blessed more. Besides, it might create more problems if people only think about saving some money and their convenience. If a plastic sky lantern falls on the ground, it might cause a fire, and if it falls into the ocean, it might cost the life of a fish. Such deeds are against reason and nature. If people do that, the wishes they make while releasing a sky lantern would never come true. The Ministry of Environment should ban the use of plastic materials in making sky lanterns. A small regulation would lead to immediate results and immense benefits.
Chen Yen-ling
Taipei
The war virus unleashed by Russian President Vladimir Putin has reached the Korean Peninsula, raising alarm. By labeling his invasion of Ukraine as a “special military operation,” Putin has revived a territorial conquest reminiscent of a bygone era, casting himself as a modern-day czar. Few could have imagined such a brutal war in Europe, which has resulted in 500,000 casualties, including 120,000 Russian soldiers. The more alarming issue is that Putin’s barbaric actions have not ended there. By involving North Korea, he has now heightened the risk of war in Asia, too. The newly signed North Korea-Russia treaty, which includes
Russian President Vladimir Putin probably believed in his heart that after invading Ukraine it would be left with no choice but to take a beating with no means of fighting back. He likely believed Ukraine would use up all of its might to defend itself and be left with no energy to turn the fight around and into Russia. He was relaxed and unburdened. Regardless of which direction the war would take, the fight would never leave Ukrainian territory. The Russian public believed the same thing and did not concern themselves with the war, with some even going so far
Oil, copper, soybeans and a handful of others monopolized the attention — but of all commodities, the humble lump of iron ore benefited the most from the Chinese economic boom of the past 25 years. It was an astonishing bonanza: From the late 1990s to earlier this year, iron ore prices jumped nearly 10-fold, more than any other major commodity; traded volume tripled; Australian commodity tycoons become billionaires; mining companies turned, even briefly, into Wall Street darlings; and mighty legal battles broke for control of the last untapped mineral deposits. Now, it is over: The greatest commodity boom thus far of the
The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and its chairman and former presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) are embroiled in a series of political donation scandals, and many believe the political ramifications could be significant, threatening the party’s future. In the past two weeks, analysts questioned the party’s use of political donations it received during the election campaign, based on donation disclosure data published by the Control Yuan. The data showed that Ko’s campaign office made several questionable payments to marketing companies, including the marketing firm Muko (木可行銷公關). Two marketing companies said they did not receive the three payments totaling NT$9.16 million (US$285,982) that