There are many reasons Apple Inc’s stock has not been so hot lately, but a big one is that investors feel the company lacks a compelling “story” on artificial intelligence (AI). By that they mean Apple CEO Tim Cook does not seem as if he has much of a plan.
Google, to its credit, does have an AI story. Unfortunately, it is a tragicomedy. Caught on the hop by upstart OpenAI, its Gemini model is best known not for its intelligence, but for its depiction of former US president George Washington as a black man, the pope as an Asian woman and other assorted embarrassments.
This is all to say: The BFFs — that is best frenemies forever — need each other’s support right now. They have long been rivals as mobile platforms, but news about talks of a tie-up between the two, which would bring Google’s Gemini AI to Apple’s iPhone, is a deal that could solve short-term headaches for both companies.
The “Geminiphone” — a nickname Apple would absolutely hate if it sticks — would give Apple devices a taste of the cutting-edge AI customers are soon likely to expect as standard and which developers are already demanding. Apple would have preferred, no doubt, to have built such capability itself, but without the huge server farms on hand to train models, it has been left behind — for now.
Google provides enhanced AI capabilities, albeit in a still highly experimental form.
Details of the partnership have not been filled out, and it does not yet seem to have been fully agreed upon.
However, it has similarities with Apple and Google’s deal on search, in which Google pays handsomely to be the default search engine on iOS devices. As in that arrangement, Google gets that one thing it is always hungry for: scale.
It might at first seem curious that Google is not planning to keep its AI to itself, making it exclusive to Android phones, but that runs counter to its long-established North Star of simply having as many users as possible.
By bringing Gemini to the iPhone, it would not only get millions more potential users, but affluent ones who might pay a premium to use advanced AI. More users means more data, and more data means a better, more valuable product.
However, where this deal might differ from search is that the BFFs are on a much more equal footing. Due to its laggard position, Apple needs Google’s AI in way it did not necessarily need Google Search.
That is why it would be surprising if Google ends up shoveling tens of billions of dollars into Apple’s hands for the privilege of being on the iPhone — especially not when it is being sued by the US Department of Justice over that tactic for cementing its position in online search.
No one knows if this would be an exclusive deal and, given those antitrust concerns, it might be wiser for it not to be — AI partnerships between tech companies are already on regulators’ radars. Bloomberg chief correspondent Mark Gurman said that Apple was also speaking to ChatGPT maker OpenAI, and it could well be interested in others. Although, like search, one wonders if users would pick one general-purpose AI and mostly stick with it, making first-mover advantage as important as ever.
Yet what is Apple giving up here? The company has shown in the past it has no qualms incorporating third parties, even rivals, when they offer great features Apple users might want. For example, the first iPhone came preinstalled with YouTube.
However, AI is surely not just a feature, but the future — one that Apple would not be satisfied with outsourcing for long. Of course, the company is working on its own AI projects, as described in a recently published research paper. It might even seek to shut out Google, and anyone else, as soon as it can do a good enough job itself.
Investors in both companies seem delighted, sensing something of an answer to the Microsoft and OpenAI surge. For months now, Cook has been steadily reassuring investors, hinting at significant breakthroughs that might be announced at its coming developers’ conference in June. Expectations are already sky high.
Dave Lee is Bloomberg Opinion’s US technology columnist. He was previously a correspondent for the Financial Times and BBC News.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
RSS