Mr. Editor of the Taipei Times, I have the pleasure to address you on the occasion of requesting the Right of Reply, enshrined in International Law, on the editorial article of your newspaper dated March 22, 2024, titled “The Taiwan-Paraguay Relationship,” which is detailed below.
The democratic values of a state are the set of ethical, moral and social virtues, based on a series of beliefs and behaviors, which a given society sustains. They support their actions, both in the internal sphere and in the external sphere of the nation. It is within this context that Paraguay has given a number of principles of international law the status of constitutional foundations of our foreign policy.
Our Constitution, in its Part II “On the Political Order of the Republic,” Title I “On the Nation and the State,” Chapter II “On International Relations,” in its Article 143, expresses: “The Republic of Paraguay, in its international relations, it accepts international law and conforms to the following principles: … 2) the self-determination of peoples …”
This concept means the right of a people to decide its own forms of government, pursue its economic, social and cultural development, and structure itself freely, without external interference and in accordance with the principles of equity and equality. It also means the right to interact with other nations that make up the international system and that no foreign state can encroach on that right.
Since the establishment of democracy in my country in February 1989, numerous legal provisions have established the defense and promotion of democracy as a basic principle of Paraguayan foreign policy. What has been clearly reflected in international scenarios such as support for UN peace operations, declarations on human rights violations in other countries and the repeated request both in the UN Assembly and in the various international organizations, the reintegration of Taiwan into the international system.
There is no doubt that we must consider the existence of two main aspects in the contribution of foreign policy to the consolidation of the observance of human rights and democracy in our nation. First, by strengthening political and economic ties with those countries that share the same values and have as a rule the full validity of the rule of law, as is the case with this island, and secondly, establishing formal agreements that contribute to strengthening and protecting human rights and democratic institutions around the world, appealing to international solidarity through the establishment of multilateral commitments that seek to protect and consolidate this system of life around the world.
Thus, we can summarize Paraguay’s foreign policy in the field of human rights and democracy in four main purposes:
One: Democratic coexistence according to the model established in the Constitution of 1992.
Two: Security understood as the effective protection of the life and rights and freedoms of citizens, as well as the defense, stability, continuity and territorial integrity of the state.
Three: Sustainable prosperity; or, what is the same, a country aimed at achieving economic well-being based on growth, social cohesion, job creation, respect for the environment, competitiveness of the productive fabric, secure access to energy supply, the possibility of obtaining financing, and fiscal responsibility.
Four: Culture and knowledge, understood from the respect for diversity and variety of positions and thoughts. Based on these principles and values, Paraguay develops its foreign policy and it is incorrect and offensive to assume that other motives are guiding, as stated in the aforementioned editorial.
In closing, I would like to recall Israeli leader David Ben-Gurion who said: “Without moral and intellectual independence, there is no anchor for national independence.”
Paraguay is currently a model of democracy and full observance of rights, and the categorizations expressed by foreigners often lack objectivity because they point to different models from the mentality of our people, a fact that Taiwanese know in depth.
The author of the article in question in this newspaper should know more about Paraguay to be able to talk about it, otherwise he becomes only a spokesperson for organizations or individuals who have a particular interest in damaging the image of my country and the solid relations between two fraternal peoples, such as Paraguay and Taiwan.
I take this opportunity to greet you with my most distinguished appreciation.
Carlos Jose Fleitas Rodriguez is the Ambassador of Paraguay to the Republic of China (Taiwan).
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
A report by the US-based Jamestown Foundation on Tuesday last week warned that China is operating illegal oil drilling inside Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Island (Dongsha, 東沙群島), marking a sharp escalation in Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics. The report said that, starting in July, state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp installed 12 permanent or semi-permanent oil rig structures and dozens of associated ships deep inside Taiwan’s EEZ about 48km from the restricted waters of Pratas Island in the northeast of the South China Sea, islands that are home to a Taiwanese garrison. The rigs not only typify
RSS