During the process of criminal proceedings, prosecutors are a party to the litigation, and are therefore not fair or impartial participants in the trial.
For this reason, if we were to allow prosecutors to be a party to a case and provide them with an enforceable right to make a disposition, that would not only be unfair and unjust, but would be subject to abuse and overreach.
Therefore, in a modern democracy, a prosecutor should have no enforceable right to make a disposition whatsoever against a defendant.
This legal concept has long been established in Taiwan since the early 1990s, especially among legislators belonging to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), who requested a constitutional interpretation on the issue in 1995.
These legislators invited me to be the appraiser of the legal question submitted before the grand justices. As such, I went before the court and strongly advocated that they abolish prosecutors’ right to custody/pretrial detention, the motion of which was subsequently adopted by the grand justices.
In 1998, another appraiser went before the grand justices and proposed an interpretation for the abolition of prosecutors’ right to searches.
I was asked to comment on the matter, and I submitted an article in which I expounded upon my ideas that, as prosecutors were considered parties to legal cases, they should in no way have any enforceable power to make dispositions.
As a result, not only should prosecutors’ rights to searches be abolished, so too should their right to detain — restraining people’s freedom of movement — otherwise the reform could not be considered complete.
However, as the person who requested the interpretation only specified the prosecutors’ right to search, the interpretation did not broach the issue of the right to detain.
That being the case, this day, the fears I had at the time has come to pass.
When a problem with prosecutors occurs, they fully shift their responsibility to the police and do not reflect on the matter in the least, which is a problem for the nation and the public.
I am well aware that neither the legal world nor prosecutors are fond of outside criticism, but they must know that criticism is the driving force behind progress and without it, there could be no progress.
Huan Tong-shong is a former president of National Chung Hsing University.
Translated by Tim Smith
To The Honorable Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜): We would like to extend our sincerest regards to you for representing Taiwan at the inauguration of US President Donald Trump on Monday. The Taiwanese-American community was delighted to see that Taiwan’s Legislative Yuan speaker not only received an invitation to attend the event, but successfully made the trip to the US. We sincerely hope that you took this rare opportunity to share Taiwan’s achievements in freedom, democracy and economic development with delegations from other countries. In recent years, Taiwan’s economic growth and world-leading technology industry have been a source of pride for Taiwanese-Americans.
Next week, the nation is to celebrate the Lunar New Year break. Unfortunately, cold winds are a-blowing, literally and figuratively. The Central Weather Administration has warned of an approaching cold air mass, while obstinate winds of chaos eddy around the Legislative Yuan. English theologian Thomas Fuller optimistically pointed out in 1650 that “it’s always darkest before the dawn.” We could paraphrase by saying the coldest days are just before the renewed hope of spring. However, one must temper any optimism about the damage being done in the legislature by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), under
To our readers: Due to the Lunar New Year holiday, from Sunday, Jan. 26, through Sunday, Feb. 2, the Taipei Times will have a reduced format without our regular editorials and opinion pieces. From Tuesday to Saturday the paper will not be delivered to subscribers, but will be available for purchase at convenience stores. Subscribers will receive the editions they missed once normal distribution resumes on Sunday, Feb. 2. The paper returns to its usual format on Monday, Feb. 3, when our regular editorials and opinion pieces will also be resumed.
This year would mark the 30th anniversary of the establishment of the India Taipei Association (ITA) in Taipei and the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center (TECC) in New Delhi. From the vision of “Look East” in the 1990s, India’s policy has evolved into a resolute “Act East,” which complements Taiwan’s “New Southbound Policy.” In these three decades, India and Taiwan have forged a rare partnership — one rooted in shared democratic values, a commitment to openness and pluralism, and clear complementarities in trade and technology. The government of India has rolled out the red carpet for Taiwanese investors with attractive financial incentives