The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has again proposed allowing Chinese spouses to obtain Taiwanese citizenship in four years instead of six. Following the proposal, inequity between Chinese and non-Chinese spouses in the naturalization processes is being discussed. The difference needs to be clarified and the process should be reformed.
KMT lawmakers said that disparity in the naturalization process signifies discrimination against Chinese spouses, who have to wait six years to obtain Taiwanese citizenship under the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), while spouses of other nationalities need only four years, according to the Nationality Act (國籍法).
The KMT made a hasty generalization over the differences of the naturalization processes of Chinese spouses and other foreign spouses. However, while other foreign spouses in most cases need to renounce their existing nationality to obtain Taiwanese citizenship, Chinese spouses only need to renounce their household registration in China, as Beijing does not allow dual nationality. Chinese spouses face difficulties in giving up nationality, as the authoritarian country sees Taiwan as its subordinate, not an equal.
Other foreign spouses are required to take a naturalization test to prove their language fluency and knowledge of civil rights and responsibilities, which Chinese spouses are exempt from.
Including to renounce their original nationality and to take the test, it takes six to eight years on average for other foreign spouses to obtain Taiwanese citizenship, according to the Ministry of the Interior — a period longer than average time for Chinese spouses.
More ironically, it would take at least 11 years for a Chinese spouse to apply for Macau citizenship and seven years for Hong Kong citizenship, although the two are “special administrations” of China. The spouses from other provinces in China need 10 years to get household registration in Beijing or Shanghai.
An online petition, which has collected more than 60,000 signatures in three days, demanding a halt to the KMT proposal said that Chinese spouses’ relatives could apply for multiple-entry visas for longer than six months, and parents older than 70 and children younger than 12 could reside in Taiwan and be included in the National Health Insurance system, while other foreign spouses’ first-degree relatives are limited to three to six-month visits.
Do not ignore the elephant in the room that some KMT lawmakers seem to be missing: China, which is persistently hostile toward Taiwan and has ambitions to take over the nation, implemented a National Intelligence Law in 2018 making it an obligation for all of its citizens to cooperate with its intelligence services — an obligation that applies to Chinese spouses based in Taiwan.
Democratic Progress Party Legislator Huang Jie (黃捷) on Monday last week introduced a draft amendment that would require Chinese spouses to swear an oath of loyalty to Taiwan and to take a test of civic knowledge.
There are more than 384,000 Chinese spouses in Taiwan, including 275,000 who were naturalized or got permanent residency, January’s immigration data showed.
Chinese spouses account for 66 percent of foreign spouses in Taiwan, they showed.
Naturalization regulations should be reformed to avoid discrimination for all foreign spouses, not just for Chinese ones. Although an oath could not necessarily guarantee loyalty to a nation, Huang’s proposal or similar mechanisms should be included. They could be a reminder that all Taiwanese have a responsibility to safeguard the nation’s sovereignty and security.
Would China attack Taiwan during the American lame duck period? For months, there have been worries that Beijing would seek to take advantage of an American president slowed by age and a potentially chaotic transition to make a move on Taiwan. In the wake of an American election that ended without drama, that far-fetched scenario will likely prove purely hypothetical. But there is a crisis brewing elsewhere in Asia — one with which US president-elect Donald Trump may have to deal during his first days in office. Tensions between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea have been at
Russian President Vladimir Putin’s hypersonic missile carried a simple message to the West over Ukraine: Back off, and if you do not, Russia reserves the right to hit US and British military facilities. Russia fired a new intermediate-range hypersonic ballistic missile known as “Oreshnik,” or Hazel Tree, at Ukraine on Thursday in what Putin said was a direct response to strikes on Russia by Ukrainian forces with US and British missiles. In a special statement from the Kremlin just after 8pm in Moscow that day, the Russian president said the war was escalating toward a global conflict, although he avoided any nuclear
US President-elect Donald Trump has been declaring his personnel picks for his incoming Cabinet. Many are staunchly opposed to China. South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem, Trump’s nomination to be his next secretary of the US Department of Homeland Security, said that since 2000, China has had a long-term plan to destroy the US. US Representative Mike Waltz, nominated by Trump to be national security adviser, has stated that the US is engaged in a cold war with China, and has criticized Canada as being weak on Beijing. Even more vocal and unequivocal than these two Cabinet picks is Trump’s nomination for
An article written by Uber Eats Taiwan general manager Chai Lee (李佳穎) published in the Liberty Times (sister paper of the Taipei Times) on Tuesday said that Uber Eats promises to engage in negotiations to create a “win-win” situation. The article asserted that Uber Eats’ acquisition of Foodpanda would bring about better results for Taiwan. The National Delivery Industrial Union (NDIU), a trade union for food couriers in Taiwan, would like to express its doubts about and dissatisfaction with Lee’s article — if Uber Eats truly has a clear plan, why has this so-called plan not been presented at relevant
RSS