The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has again proposed allowing Chinese spouses to obtain Taiwanese citizenship in four years instead of six. Following the proposal, inequity between Chinese and non-Chinese spouses in the naturalization processes is being discussed. The difference needs to be clarified and the process should be reformed.
KMT lawmakers said that disparity in the naturalization process signifies discrimination against Chinese spouses, who have to wait six years to obtain Taiwanese citizenship under the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), while spouses of other nationalities need only four years, according to the Nationality Act (國籍法).
The KMT made a hasty generalization over the differences of the naturalization processes of Chinese spouses and other foreign spouses. However, while other foreign spouses in most cases need to renounce their existing nationality to obtain Taiwanese citizenship, Chinese spouses only need to renounce their household registration in China, as Beijing does not allow dual nationality. Chinese spouses face difficulties in giving up nationality, as the authoritarian country sees Taiwan as its subordinate, not an equal.
Other foreign spouses are required to take a naturalization test to prove their language fluency and knowledge of civil rights and responsibilities, which Chinese spouses are exempt from.
Including to renounce their original nationality and to take the test, it takes six to eight years on average for other foreign spouses to obtain Taiwanese citizenship, according to the Ministry of the Interior — a period longer than average time for Chinese spouses.
More ironically, it would take at least 11 years for a Chinese spouse to apply for Macau citizenship and seven years for Hong Kong citizenship, although the two are “special administrations” of China. The spouses from other provinces in China need 10 years to get household registration in Beijing or Shanghai.
An online petition, which has collected more than 60,000 signatures in three days, demanding a halt to the KMT proposal said that Chinese spouses’ relatives could apply for multiple-entry visas for longer than six months, and parents older than 70 and children younger than 12 could reside in Taiwan and be included in the National Health Insurance system, while other foreign spouses’ first-degree relatives are limited to three to six-month visits.
Do not ignore the elephant in the room that some KMT lawmakers seem to be missing: China, which is persistently hostile toward Taiwan and has ambitions to take over the nation, implemented a National Intelligence Law in 2018 making it an obligation for all of its citizens to cooperate with its intelligence services — an obligation that applies to Chinese spouses based in Taiwan.
Democratic Progress Party Legislator Huang Jie (黃捷) on Monday last week introduced a draft amendment that would require Chinese spouses to swear an oath of loyalty to Taiwan and to take a test of civic knowledge.
There are more than 384,000 Chinese spouses in Taiwan, including 275,000 who were naturalized or got permanent residency, January’s immigration data showed.
Chinese spouses account for 66 percent of foreign spouses in Taiwan, they showed.
Naturalization regulations should be reformed to avoid discrimination for all foreign spouses, not just for Chinese ones. Although an oath could not necessarily guarantee loyalty to a nation, Huang’s proposal or similar mechanisms should be included. They could be a reminder that all Taiwanese have a responsibility to safeguard the nation’s sovereignty and security.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS