In the case of Kai Kai (剴剴) — a one-year-old boy who died, allegedly from abuse by a Taipei nanny surnamed Liu (劉) — a Child Welfare League Foundation (兒福聯盟) social worker was handcuffed and detained by police for falsifying home visit records and failing to detect the abuse at an early stage.
Meanwhile, many are wondering why the Taipei City Government’s Department of Health did not include the boy in the government’s Specialized Doctor Child Care Program.
The handling of the case has caused panic among medical groups online, with doctors worried that they could also be held accountable for failing to detect child abuse cases in a timely manner. Some are planning to withdraw from the program.
The Ministry of Health and Welfare launched the Specialized Doctor Child Care Pilot Program in 2020. The ministry invited health bureaus throughout the nation to incorporate a “list of children under the age of three in high-risk and vulnerable families” provided by social care bureaus with their designated cases, and assigned them to specialized doctors who would regularly monitor the children’s health and development.
Why was Kai Kai not included in the program? Taipei City’s Health and Social Welfare departments should provide an explanation.
Had he been included, the abuse might have been detected at an early stage through home visits stipulated in the doctor care plan.
However, even if Kai Kai was included in the specialized doctor program, would the tragedy have been avoided?
It is doubtful, because apart from meeting with the children in clinics and making phone calls to encourage those looking after them to send them for vaccinations and regular health check-ups, the program only has home visits for high-risk children once or twice a year.
During such visits, doctors might not necessarily be able to detect child abuse unless the child’s health is extremely poor or they have new or old wounds that cannot be reasonably explained during a medical examination. Doctors are naturally obliged to report a suspected case of child abuse to health or social bureaus.
However, abused children are usually not taken to a hospital by abusive nannies or parents, so how can such cases be detected?
Instead of doctors, perhaps neighbors are more likely to notice whether a child is abused. Therefore, communities should be encouraged to report cases of child abuse to the police.
Otherwise, doctors might withdraw from the program if they are worried about being handcuffed someday, just like the Child Welfare League Foundation social worker — despite the fact that they were actually being investigated for forging home visit records.
Lin Yung-zen is president of the Taiwan Primary Care Association and a supervisor of the Taiwan Pediatric Association.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
RSS