The US House of Representatives passed a bill 352 to 65 that would give TikTok’s owner, ByteDance, six months to divest its US assets or face a ban.
It was passed with bipartisan support, showing that Democrats and Republicans have reached a consensus on preventing China’s cognitive warfare. Its rapid approval is also considered an approach to resist China’s interference and influence on the US elections in November.
When the bill was first proposed, TikTok sent users in the US a push notification, urging them to call and pressure their representatives to vote against the bill. That perfectly suggests that it has the ability and intention to interfere in US politics.
TikTok has a rapidly growing market share in the US. Most users are young, among who are content creators making a living through it and are one of the main drivers behind protests against the TikTok legislation. Others claiming freedom of speech also speak out against it.
Most US congresspeople tend to support the bill even though they could lose young votes in the upcoming elections. That shows members of the US Congress’ strong will to protect the country from Chinese threats and to solve problems caused by TikTok.
As for European countries, the European Parliament has passed the Digital Services Act and the Digital Markets Act by a bipartisan vote to control and regulate social media platforms to an appropriate degree. The EU has also initiated investigations on whether TikTok breaches the rules.
The underlying purposes and reasons of the US’ TikTok ban might not be consistent with those of the EU, but both show how much concern Western countries have over the informational influence shaped by social media platforms.
TikTok in Taiwan has a lower market share than in the US. However, it promotes content worldwide regarding Chinese unification with Taiwan and that promotes cultural assimilation.
Concerns including non-guaranteed users’ privacy, addiction-inducing algorithms and lack of responsibility to censor content that is unsafe for the public or individuals remain unsolved. Western countries have been aware of that and passed bills to stop it, but Taiwan has no legislation that can hold the platform accountable for the dangers of content provided by its users.
The National Communications Commission previously drafted a digital law, but this was not passed due to concerns over the invasion of personal privacy. Since then, there has been no general consensus in Taiwan on the matter. That is not different from opening the gate welcoming China’s manipulation and data collection.
With rising market share of Chinese applications such as TikTok and Pinterest-like app Xiaohongshu — also known as Little Red Book — the government should refer to Western countries’ actions.
It is necessary to at least monitor Chinese social media platforms despite difficulties with placing a nationwide ban on them.
Hong Tsun-ming, originally from Hong Kong, is a specialist in the Taiwan Statebuilding Party’s international section.
Translated by Hsieh Yi-ching
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS