Electricity rates charged by Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) are to rise across the board next month, awaiting an electricity price review committee convened by the Ministry of Economic Affairs this month. How strongly this would affect consumer prices has become a concern for many, including the central bank. Two issues worth paying attention to regarding the upcoming electricity rate hikes are:
First, high power prices tend to create inflationary pressures on other costs of firms and industries, which might end up being passed on to customers.
Second, the hikes could have a chain reaction effect on inflation expectations, likely resulting in a self-perpetuating spiral of rising consumer prices.
Last week, the central bank said that it was much more worried about inflation expectations getting embedded into economic behavior. At a meeting of the legislature’s Finance Committee on Thursday, bank Governor Yang Chin-long (楊金龍) said that if consumer prices grow above the 2 percent threshold for an extended period, inflation expectations would be anchored, making it hard to bring inflation down.
The Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics said that a 10 percent hike in electricity rates might push up inflation by 0.12 percentage points annually. This only reflects power prices’ direct effect on the household sector, without taking into account their indirect effect on other sectors of the economy — which refers to the chained interactions between the electricity sector and other sectors.
Suppose that the effect of industrial linkage between the electricity sector and other sectors — despite varying sectoral correlations — is also considered: When there is a hike in electricity rates, overall production costs increase accordingly. Chemical materials, non-metallic mineral products and water supply would see marked increases in prices, followed by textiles, plastic products, accommodation fees, paper products, computers and electronic components, while housekeeping and residential services as well as financial services and investments would see the least increases in prices, analysts said.
Whether a firm would pass the extra financial burden on to consumers or absorb the costs itself could be discussed from two aspects.
The first involves the level of competition a firm faces in its respective market, and the other is related to the firm’s inflation expectations, which is also the most unpredictable factor and is therefore difficult to deal with. Meanwhile, experience shows that firms would begin to pass on the cost increases to consumers in the second month of post-price hikes, with the highest costs in the fourth month, before decreasing in the following months.
Inflation has long been a highly debated subject among politicians, businesspeople and economists. Some say that moderate inflation levels are needed to drive consumption — assuming that higher levels of spending are crucial for economic growth — while others say that rising prices make it harder to save money and that this phenomenon benefits only a few people at the expense of others. However, the history of the world economy has taught us that inflation and inflationary pressure are separated by a thin line of fear and panic amid an outsized expectation of further price rises.
When the expectation mentality spreads, inflationary pressures immediately turn into inflation monsters, impacting economic growth, changing income distributions and causing serious damage to society. At a time when the government is calculating its financial support to Taipower and subsequently the scope of electricity rate hikes, policymakers must not ignore the matter of inflation expectations, because it plays such a critical role in the effective implementation of the central bank’s monetary policy.
Sometimes actual inflation depends on what people expect it to be.
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
World leaders are preparing themselves for a second Donald Trump presidency. Some leaders know more or less where he stands: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy knows that a difficult negotiation process is about to be forced on his country, and the leaders of NATO countries would be well aware of being complacent about US military support with Trump in power. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would likely be feeling relief as the constraints placed on him by the US President Joe Biden administration would finally be released. However, for President William Lai (賴清德) the calculation is not simple. Trump has surrounded himself