The prime minister of one of the larger Caribbean countries travels to east Africa to secure a police deployment that would help address runaway gang violence back home, where a recent attack on the national penitentiary freed 4,000 prisoners. Failing in his endeavors, he flies back across the Atlantic Ocean, but is unable to land because the gangs have seized the airport.
After a neighboring country denies him landing rights, he ends up in a third country, while the notoriously bloodthirsty chief of one of the leading gangs demands his resignation. Foreign powers voice their concerns, but the hapless prime minister is left twisting in the wind.
Fears of widespread famine grow as the breakdown of the state and deepening civil disorder hamper even the most basic activities.
Illustration: Kevin Sheu
Eventually, the stranded prime minister agrees to resign once a transition council has been established. However, gang leaders are now demanding a continued role in any new government.
Though this might sound like the unlikely plot of a cheap telenovela, it is exactly what is happening in Haiti — the world’s first black republic, the first independent country in Latin America and the site of the New World’s first successful slave rebellion (1791-1804).
Since the assassination of former Haitian president Jovenel Moise in July 2021, the poorest country in the western hemisphere (and among the poorest in the world) has been mired in chaos, with the government unable to impose any kind of order. Elections have not been held for many years and the unelected prime minister, Ariel Henry, lacks legitimacy.
However, he had been able to count on the US government’s full backing — until now.
Haitian authorities did make a serious effort to establish a professional police force some years ago, but the Haitian National Police, decimated in battles with the gangs and demoralized by a lack of government support, has become a shadow of its former self. The armed forces — better known for their propensity for overthrowing governments than for their military prowess — have long since been dissolved.
The Haitian government has been desperately seeking assistance from the international community for more than a year now, to no avail.
The UN estimates that 4,000 people were killed in gang-related violence last year alone, while another 3,000 were kidnapped. And yet no country in the western hemisphere has been willing to become directly involved.
The US, for its part, offered US$200 million to cover the costs of a 1,000-strong Kenyan police force deployment, a proposal greenlighted by the UN Security Council. The idea that it should fall to an east African country to intervene in the Caribbean stretches credulity, but such is the absurdity of Haiti’s plight.
In any case, the deployment has been derailed by domestic opposition, with the Kenyan High Court ruling against the plan.
While Haiti burns, reporters and pundits have been holding forth on all the reasons that the international community should not intervene. Such arguments draw on memories of the US occupation of Haiti between 1915 and 1934, and on the more recent crisis of the 1990s, when the US stepped in to remove a military junta led by General Raoul Cedras.
As US President Joe Biden, then a senator, said at the time: “If Haiti — a God-awful thing to say — just quietly sunk into the Caribbean, or rose up 300 feet, it wouldn’t matter a whole lot in terms of our interests.”
Other commentators emphasize the perceived failures of MINUSTAH, the UN mission that was sent to stabilize Haiti from 2004 to 2017.
However, much of this bad press is unjustified. From 2004 to 2010 — when a devastating earthquake hit Haiti — MINUSTAH had stabilized the country and helped it to regain a sense of purpose following the somewhat traumatic transition to democracy after the fall of the Duvalier dynasty in 1986.
The US and Canada are not the only ones refusing to do what is needed in Haiti. The same goes for the Latin American countries that previously played a central role in MINUSTAH: Brazil, Chile, Argentina and Uruguay. In fact, MINUSTAH was the first-ever UN operation in which Latin American troops comprised a majority.
At a time when the region is becoming less relevant on the international stage, it has much to gain by stepping in to address the most urgent crisis in its own neighborhood. Who better to rescue millions of innocent Haitians from another downward spiral into violence, dysfunction and famine?
If the moral case for helping the hemisphere’s poorest, most crisis-ridden country does not carry much weight in today’s international political climate, perhaps sheer self-interest will do the trick.
Letting Haitians “stew in their own juice” (my paraphrase of the current situation) is not only cynical and morally indefensible; it is simply foolish. Failed states have a way of becoming centers of international organized crime, terrorism and drug trafficking.
Do we really want a Somalia in the Caribbean?
Jorge Heine, a research professor at the Frederick S. Pardee School of Global Studies at Boston University, is the editor of Fixing Haiti: MINUSTAH and Beyond.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the
RSS