With the rising threat from the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) — including incursions by its air force across the median line of the Taiwan Strait and military drills in Taiwan’s southwestern and southeastern air defense identification zones day and night — tensions in the Taiwan Strait and the wider region are dangerously high.
To enhance the air defense capabilities of pilots, the Republic of China Air Force said that it would resume late-night flight training from 11pm to early morning.
Night-flight capability is a key indicator to determine whether an air force possesses round-the-clock preparedness.
The pressure on Taiwan’s air force will only increase now that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) said it would increase its national defense budget in the annual “two sessions” gathering of the Chinese government.
The CCP’s national defense budget is about the equivalent of NT$7.32 trillion (US$231.26 billion), about 12 times what Taiwan spends.
To tackle the imbalanced situation, Taiwan’s military should bolster its training programs, not engage in an arms race.
Instrument flight rules (IFR), where pilots rely solely on flight deck instruments, are one of the most important parts of night training.
Based on data from instruments, pilots can ascertain crucial information such as altitude, conditions outside the aircraft and changes in topography.
Moreover, night-time IFR training can reduce the possibility of accidents caused by spatial disorientation — the inability to determine position or relative motion.
The three main kinds of fighter jets Taiwan deploys are equipped with complete night-time flight instruments.
The nation’s air force has also intensified late-night training in F-16 jets and other aircraft after upgrading their equipment and purchasing new items.
In the face of the CCP’s threat, pragmatically making decisions for military personnel is an important part of preparation. Although night flights might bother nearby residents, people should view national security as a priority and support the military.
Ray Song is a doctoral student at Tamkang University’s Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies.
Translated by Chien Yan-ru
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS