With the rising threat from the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) — including incursions by its air force across the median line of the Taiwan Strait and military drills in Taiwan’s southwestern and southeastern air defense identification zones day and night — tensions in the Taiwan Strait and the wider region are dangerously high.
To enhance the air defense capabilities of pilots, the Republic of China Air Force said that it would resume late-night flight training from 11pm to early morning.
Night-flight capability is a key indicator to determine whether an air force possesses round-the-clock preparedness.
The pressure on Taiwan’s air force will only increase now that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) said it would increase its national defense budget in the annual “two sessions” gathering of the Chinese government.
The CCP’s national defense budget is about the equivalent of NT$7.32 trillion (US$231.26 billion), about 12 times what Taiwan spends.
To tackle the imbalanced situation, Taiwan’s military should bolster its training programs, not engage in an arms race.
Instrument flight rules (IFR), where pilots rely solely on flight deck instruments, are one of the most important parts of night training.
Based on data from instruments, pilots can ascertain crucial information such as altitude, conditions outside the aircraft and changes in topography.
Moreover, night-time IFR training can reduce the possibility of accidents caused by spatial disorientation — the inability to determine position or relative motion.
The three main kinds of fighter jets Taiwan deploys are equipped with complete night-time flight instruments.
The nation’s air force has also intensified late-night training in F-16 jets and other aircraft after upgrading their equipment and purchasing new items.
In the face of the CCP’s threat, pragmatically making decisions for military personnel is an important part of preparation. Although night flights might bother nearby residents, people should view national security as a priority and support the military.
Ray Song is a doctoral student at Tamkang University’s Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies.
Translated by Chien Yan-ru
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022