The president of the US delivered his annual address to Congress on Thursday night — except what Americans and an increasingly nervous world wanted to assess was less the state of the union than the state of Joe Biden. I don’t mean politically, I mean physically.
In the week that confirmed the November election will be a rematch of the 2020 contest — the current president against the former one — Biden needed to prove he was not the doddering, even senile figure of former US president Donald Trump’s rhetoric and a thousand social media memes. In 68 combative minutes, he cleared that bar.
He ad-libbed, he took on Republican hecklers and, often at high volume, jabbed at his opponent.
The result: a performance that pundits described as “feisty” and “scrappy,” free of senior moments, and which prompted even Fox News to muse that Biden seemed “jacked-up” — which, from the network that likes to depict the president as a walking corpse, was a compliment.
Projecting vigor was essential because the mountain Biden has to climb over the next eight months is getting steeper. For one thing, this week established that Trump is not only the certain nominee of his party — crushing his last remaining challenger, Nikki Haley, in all but one of the Super Tuesday primary contests and forcing her out of the race — he is in total control of it.
Republicans in Congress are supine before him, whether it is outgoing Senate leader Mitch McConnell endorsing him this week — even though Trump has repeatedly insulted McConnell’s Taiwan-born wife in nakedly racist terms and the two men have not spoken in three years — or the Republican refusal to pass a border deal they had agreed with Democrats, because Trump wants the issue of immigration to remain unaddressed so that he can attack Biden for failing to address it come November.
Some had hoped a primary season against Republican opponents would batter and bruise Trump, weakening him ahead of the presidential election. It has not worked out that way.
Though that was not the only Democratic fantasy to be dented, if not dashed, this week. Many have hoped Trump’s undoing will come in the courts, where he faces a staggering 91 criminal charges. Indeed, judges in Colorado (and two other states) had removed Trump from the ballot, citing the constitution’s disqualification of anyone involved in insurrection, in Trump’s case the storming of the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. However on Monday, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously against Colorado, ensuring Trump’s place on the ballot in all 50 states.
The previous week, the same supreme court, now dominated by the right thanks to three Trump appointments, issued a timetable that effectively slows down the most potent of the cases against the former president: the charge that he sought to subvert the 2020 election. That makes it much less likely that there will be a conviction this side of polling day, a realization that hits Democrats hard.
For years, they have longed for this or that judicial authority to solve the US’ Trump problem: special counsel Robert Mueller and his investigation into collusion between Trump and Moscow played that role for a while. Time and again, the dream evaporates. Democrats now face the awkward reality that, if they are to defeat Trump, they will surely have to do it the way they did it in 2020: with votes.
That task is now looking ever harder. It is not just the headline figures from national polls in which Trump is often ahead, or even Trump’s lead in the battleground states. It is the change afoot in key voting groups that were crucial to Biden’s victory in the last election. Trump is gaining ground among Black and Hispanic voters, regularly picking up 20 percent to 25 percent of the former. To be sure, Biden is still ahead — but not by the massive margins he once enjoyed and which he needs to offset Trump’s advantage with white voters.
Perhaps most alarming for Democrats is the defection of the young. Biden won voters under 30 by 25 points in 2020, now it is neck and neck. A big part of that is the president’s support for Israel, with the appalling images coming out of Gaza outraging younger Americans especially. Mindful of them, and the disaffected Arab-American voters who could tip the balance in the critical swing state of Michigan, Biden announced a plan to create a floating pier off the Gazan coast, enabling maritime shipments of aid.
Given that it will take weeks to build, and Gazans are desperate for food right now, and given too that there is obviously a simpler, swifter way to get aid in — by exerting full US pressure on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, demanding he stops the delays — the Democrats’ progressive wing is unlikely to be placated. Taking all these developments together, it is not too strong to say the Biden coalition is fracturing.
Many watching from afar are dumbfounded that Americans could be prepared once again, and despite everything, to make Trump their president. How can that be? Surely they remember what it was like last time? To which the answer seems to be: actually, they do not. This week, the New York Times wondered if Americans suffer from “collective amnesia” when it comes to Trump, pointing to polling data that suggests the years 2017 to 2021 have fallen into the memory hole. It is partly that Trump’s outrages came so often, they created a kind of numbness: people became inured.
And it is partly that, thanks to a US media polarized on tribally partisan lines, there is no agreed, collective memory of what happened during those four turbulent years, even on Jan. 6. Add to that the inflation and border pressures of the Biden years and, as Sarah Longwell, an anti-Trump Republican consultant and convenor of focus groups, puts it: “They know what they don’t like about Biden, and they have forgotten what they don’t like about Trump.”
How can Biden hope to scale the daunting peak that confronts him? Plenty say the answer is a two-pronged message, “democracy and Dobbs”: Focus on Trump’s dictatorial aspirations and his role in appointing the supreme court, whose decision, known as Dobbs, ended the constitutional right to an abortion. However, there is good evidence that that formula, which paid dividends in 2022’s midterm elections, is no longer enough, especially among the young.
Biden needs to do more. He cannot urge Americans to be grateful for what he has achieved these last three years. They are not feeling better off and, besides, voters are rarely grateful. Nor can he rely on memories of Trump, because those are fading.
The Atlantic’s Ron Brownstein is surely right when he says Biden has to let go of the past and focus on the future, framing the coming contest as “a choice between what he and Trump would do over the next four years in the White House.” Biden’s speech on Thursday nodded to that, vowing to defend social security and Medicare, while Trump eyes up a juicy tax cut for his super-rich pals — and casting himself as a decent man up against a would-be dictator.
It was a good start but, my word, it is a marathon climb that lies ahead. Biden has lived a long life, punctuated by the severest challenges, but the one he faces now could hardly be tougher. And yet he cannot afford to fail. The world depends on it.
Jonathan Freedland is a Guardian columnist.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS