In an article published today on this page (“Let civilians lead defense ministry”), Yao Chung-yuan (姚中原), former deputy director of the Ministry of National Defense’s strategic planning department, writes that Taiwan should have a minister of national defense who comes from a nonmilitary background.
While this might eventually happen, now is not the time. At least, no such change should be made during president-elect William Lai’s (賴清德) first term in office.
Although Lai’s Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would control the executive arm of government when he takes office in May, it is outnumbered by opposition parties in the legislature. The DPP is already embroiled in fierce fighting with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party. Faced with intense questioning by opposition legislators, a civilian defense minister might well stumble to answer.
Meanwhile, tensions across the Taiwan Strait have worsened following a Feb. 14 incident in which a Chinese fishing boat capsized while a Taiwanese coast guard patrol boat chased it out of restricted waters between Kinmen County and Xiamen, China. A defense minister with a military background would be better suited to assist the president, direct the armed forces, and handle this and other crises.
A defense minister with a military background would also be able to quickly learn the ropes of their ministerial duties and take on the readiness and preparation challenges related to possible armed conflict.
Any civilian defense minister who comes into office after Lai is inaugurated on May 20 cannot possibly be fully prepared. They might not even be familiar with the units of the army, navy and air force. If they find themselves floundering, they might have to rely on their subordinates to save them. That could put Lai’s government in a shaky political situation, which would be bad for the country.
Yao said that having military personnel at the top in a structure of close relations between graduates of the same institutions has left the military riddled with problems, such as communist spies leaking secrets and frequent infringements of military discipline. Such circumstances make it even more essential for the Lai administration to focus on stability in choosing its first national defense minister before implementing other reforms.
In an interview broadcast on Saturday, Swiss public radio station RSI asked Pope Francis about Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine.
“I believe that the strongest are those who see the situation, think about the people, and have the courage to raise the white flag and negotiate,” the pontiff said.
A potential war in the Taiwan Strait is the next highly uncertain risk for the world. If war breaks out, Taiwan would not be the side raising a white flag.
If incoming president Lai, with his civilian background, appoints a defense minister from the military establishment, it would probably be the “perfect match.”
Fang Ping-sheng is a retired major in the Republic of China Marine Corps.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS