In an article published today on this page (“Let civilians lead defense ministry”), Yao Chung-yuan (姚中原), former deputy director of the Ministry of National Defense’s strategic planning department, writes that Taiwan should have a minister of national defense who comes from a nonmilitary background.
While this might eventually happen, now is not the time. At least, no such change should be made during president-elect William Lai’s (賴清德) first term in office.
Although Lai’s Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would control the executive arm of government when he takes office in May, it is outnumbered by opposition parties in the legislature. The DPP is already embroiled in fierce fighting with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party. Faced with intense questioning by opposition legislators, a civilian defense minister might well stumble to answer.
Meanwhile, tensions across the Taiwan Strait have worsened following a Feb. 14 incident in which a Chinese fishing boat capsized while a Taiwanese coast guard patrol boat chased it out of restricted waters between Kinmen County and Xiamen, China. A defense minister with a military background would be better suited to assist the president, direct the armed forces, and handle this and other crises.
A defense minister with a military background would also be able to quickly learn the ropes of their ministerial duties and take on the readiness and preparation challenges related to possible armed conflict.
Any civilian defense minister who comes into office after Lai is inaugurated on May 20 cannot possibly be fully prepared. They might not even be familiar with the units of the army, navy and air force. If they find themselves floundering, they might have to rely on their subordinates to save them. That could put Lai’s government in a shaky political situation, which would be bad for the country.
Yao said that having military personnel at the top in a structure of close relations between graduates of the same institutions has left the military riddled with problems, such as communist spies leaking secrets and frequent infringements of military discipline. Such circumstances make it even more essential for the Lai administration to focus on stability in choosing its first national defense minister before implementing other reforms.
In an interview broadcast on Saturday, Swiss public radio station RSI asked Pope Francis about Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine.
“I believe that the strongest are those who see the situation, think about the people, and have the courage to raise the white flag and negotiate,” the pontiff said.
A potential war in the Taiwan Strait is the next highly uncertain risk for the world. If war breaks out, Taiwan would not be the side raising a white flag.
If incoming president Lai, with his civilian background, appoints a defense minister from the military establishment, it would probably be the “perfect match.”
Fang Ping-sheng is a retired major in the Republic of China Marine Corps.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS