The Legislative Yuan began its 11th term on Feb. 1 and its new members have been vying to make a name for themselves. They know they are at an inflection point, which makes for exciting observation.
Of the 113 seats, 54 are held by newcomers voted into office with lofty promises of reform. Their presence alone is enough to make for a volatile first session, but in addition, for the first time since 2004, no party holds an absolute majority.
At best, this would make the legislature a more active marketplace of ideas, as parties need to make a convincing case for their policies to gain traction. At worst, it could lock the legislature into a stalemate.
The three main parties have hit the ground running to set the tone for the first term. Lacking the presidency and grasping legislative power by its fingernails, the main opposition, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), in a strategic move, has chosen to champion oversight reform. Its caucus wants to give lawmakers — read: themselves — the right to conduct investigations, hold hearings and approve appointments to better oversee the Executive Yuan, as well as mandate an annual “state of the nation” address by the president.
Accompanying its calls for procedural reform, the party has continued its trend of oversight through disruption by taking opportunistic advantage of the daily controversy. KMT members were sure to make a scene at the new legislature’s first meeting on Feb. 20 by delaying Premier Chen Chien-jen’s (陳建仁) policy report in protest at his Cabinet’s handling of food safety issues, with reports of heated arguments on the floor between some of the new lawmakers.
Knowing their best shot at influence is through a tepid alliance with the KMT, the Taiwan People’s Party’s (TPP) eight lawmakers have sided with its calls for reform and backed its members for legislative speaker and committee chairs. After a noisy campaign, the party seems content for the moment to be a quiet kingmaker, ready to side with either of the major parties as it sees fit.
On the other side of the aisle, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been amplifying its message of internationalism. A total of 31 interparliamentary friendship groups have been established since the new session began, with the vast majority chaired by DPP members, and features strategic alliances such as with other Austronesian-language and New Southbound Policy countries. Many have been announced through enthusiastic news conferences, with speeches given by DPP lawmakers and foreign representatives, seeking to solidify the party’s status as the internationally savvy choice.
It is astute to do so, as legislature-to-legislature cooperation is an important bedrock of Taiwan’s foreign relations in lieu of formal diplomatic ties. If KMT leadership were paying attention, they would be seeking to wrest that narrative from their opponents. Instead, they seem to have doubled down on the China-friendly stance and the disruptive antics that lost them the past three presidential elections, even sending KMT Vice Chairman Andrew Hsia (夏立言) to China once again for a photo op with Taiwan Affairs Office Director Song Tao (宋濤).
The KMT seems to have realized this particular error, or at least is paying lip service to it.
Parliamentary diplomacy is an important job of the legislature, Deputy Legislative Speaker Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) said earlier this month, vowing to “continue to convey Taiwanese voices” abroad.
Still, the party’s actions seem to indicate that it has not learned any lessons from its latest defeat. Instead of meaningfully engaging in internal reform, it has continued to externalize its problems through flashy antics and a power grab, ignoring strategies that could raise its status as a trusted policymaker and global player.
Even with so many new faces, its voice still sounds the same.
The Paris Olympics are over and the five-ringed views of the Louvre, Invalides, Eiffel and Versailles just memories. As a diplomatic historian, my thoughts naturally turn to France! The Olympian of world affairs, the creators of “diplomacy,” Cardinal Richelieu and Prince Talleyrand. But sixty years ago, at the 1964 diplomatic games, Team China bested Team France in a battle of wits in “free-style negotiations” over Taiwan. Paris never recovered. To be fair, in Europe of 1963-1964, France was besieged. She had been ousted from her Asian dominions. She had begun her first nuclear weapons tests just as the United States and
Having the title doctor or the letters PhD after your name carries the connotation of having broad knowledge. In reality, while people with doctoral degrees often possess highly specialized expertise and might be held in high esteem among their peers, they are likely virtually unknown to the general public. In Taiwan, people with doctorates are common, while probably fewer than one out of 100 of them could truly make a name for themselves. Of course, there are exceptions. Those who gain media exposure can easily become well-known, especially if they are involved in politics. However, many fail to live up to
For the past few weeks, the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and its Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) have been embroiled in a series of scandals related to irregularities in their presidential campaign financial reporting. These scandals continue to expand as more evidence surfaces, raising more questions about the party’s financial propriety and competency. These irregularities include unusually high spending, allegedly accepting donations from abroad, reporting 97.3 percent of personal donations as “cash,” making large payments to marketing firms with close ties to the party and accounting errors. When the financial irregularities were first reported, the party blamed it on “arbitrary misconduct” by
Over the past few years, especially since the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a visible change in the EU’s approach to Taiwan. I call this phenomenon European hype about Taiwan. The change is noticeable at both the EU and member-state levels, with parliaments and Central Europe leading the way. The best example is the fact that Taiwan is finally mentioned in various EU documents (a real novelty compared with the past 30 years), in addition to statements by European politicians, an increase in bilateral contacts, a growing awareness of Taiwan’s importance and its contribution not only to European prosperity, but