Public diplomacy plays a pivotal role in the contemporary landscape of nation-states, serving as a fundamental element in expanding a country’s sphere of influence across borders.
For Taiwan-China relations, it is noteworthy to delve into their public diplomacy strategies in the international arena, particularly within the Indonesian context.
This discourse is further complicated by China’s assertion of sovereignty over Taiwan, juxtaposed with the nation’s self-declared status as an independent entity distinct from China.
Indonesians tend to align with the trajectory of their foreign policy, characterized by openness and engagement toward international affairs, wherein the claims of various actors in the global arena are perceived as matters of concern. Despite the Indonesian government’s adherence to the “one China” policy, Indonesians’ perceptions of these actors remain largely unaffected. Diverse viewpoints exist within the populace, with some asserting Taiwan’s distinctiveness while others maintain that it is an integral component of China.
The author contends that the interplay of the two’s public diplomacy strategies in Indonesia is integral to the situation. For instance, following the election of President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in 2016, Taiwan introduced the New Southbound Policy, aimed at fostering trade and investment collaborations with 18 nations in Southeast Asia, South Asia and Oceania. This policy was comprehensive, extending beyond trade and investment to encompass fields such as healthcare, tourism, cultural exchange, migration, education and technology. Consequently, Taiwanese public diplomacy entities, including educational institutions and humanitarian organizations, have increasingly initiated various programs in Indonesia.
Interpersonal interactions are poised to shape the prevailing perceptions of Indonesians regarding Taiwan as an autonomous entity distinct from China.
China appears intent on bolstering its public image, particularly concerning matters on Taiwan, so as not to be overshadowed. China, within the Indonesian context, undertakes public diplomacy initiatives aimed at fostering closer rapport with the Indonesian populace, notably through cultural engagements. One such endeavor is China’s collaboration with several Indonesian universities to establish the Confucius Institute, tasked with disseminating Chinese cultural elements in Indonesia. As a result, numerous Indonesian students have been allowed to immerse themselves in Chinese culture, exemplified by study programs at institutions like Guangxi Normal University in Guilin, China.
While acquainting themselves with Chinese culture, students gradually develop perceptions of China as a prominent nation with benevolent intentions in cultivating international relationships. These perceptions often lead students to see Taiwan as an integral entity closely linked to China.
These public diplomacy initiatives undertaken by Taiwan and China underscore the significant role that public diplomacy plays for these two actors in international relations, as they actively vie for acknowledgment and support from Indonesians.
Despite the efforts of both entities, Indonesians continue to have a spectrum of opinions and perspectives concerning China and Taiwan, ranging from favorable to unfavorable.
Nevertheless, the ongoing public diplomacy rivalry between these two actors in Indonesia remains compelling, with Taiwan striving for recognition as an independent entity and China seeking acknowledgment that the nation is an integral part of its territory.
M. Syaprin Zahidi is a senior lecturer in the Department of International Relations at the University of Muhammadiyah Malang and is a doctoral student at Ghazali Shafie Graduate School of Government at the Universiti Utara Malaysia.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS