A few days ago, it was nice and sunny outside, so I went to take a walk in a park. There, I overheard an elementary-school student ask: What countries do you like besides Taiwan?
The child called Taiwan by its name and said it was a country, showing that consciousness of “Taiwan is a nation” has been internalized, which delights me.
There are a few other examples of this.
As of this year, 110 countries recognize the Taiwanese passport and allow entry without a visa. Twelve of these have formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan — and welcome Taiwanese with open arms — while the rest use our country’s name, Taiwan.
They do not call it “Chinese Taipei,” “Chinese Taiwan” or “Taiwan, China.” Even the name “Republic of China” is on its way out.
Taiwan also has its own Global Trade Item Number, which is a unique number used to identify trade items and is an indicator of an exported product’s origin.
“Made in Taiwan” is a branding that has global recognition as a marker of products made with superior quality, safety and reliability.
This has also been present in the stances of our presidents: former president Lee Teng-hui’s (李登輝) “special state-to-state international relations,” former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) “one country on each side [of the Taiwan Strait]” and President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) “neither the Republic of China [Taiwan] nor the People’s Republic of China [China] are subservient to the other.”
Tsai’s administration marks 77 years of Taiwan being its own entity and with the changes over the past 36 years, the country’s diversity, governance, economy and cultural development have undeniably made it distinct and separate from China.
During the commemoration service for the 228 Incident, Taiwan Nation Alliance (台灣國家聯盟) convener Wu Shu-min (吳樹民) said that he hopes Vice President William Lai (賴清德) would find a suitable minister of education once he is inaugurated as president — one who promotes a curriculum of historical consciousness centered on Taiwan.
Under the guidance of the president-elect, Taiwanese national consciousness would continue to be promoted, ushering Taiwan toward the normalization of the nation, Wu said.
Chen Chiao-chicy is a psychiatrist at Mackay Memorial Hospital and an adjunct professor.
Translated by Tim Smith
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS