A few days ago, it was nice and sunny outside, so I went to take a walk in a park. There, I overheard an elementary-school student ask: What countries do you like besides Taiwan?
The child called Taiwan by its name and said it was a country, showing that consciousness of “Taiwan is a nation” has been internalized, which delights me.
There are a few other examples of this.
As of this year, 110 countries recognize the Taiwanese passport and allow entry without a visa. Twelve of these have formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan — and welcome Taiwanese with open arms — while the rest use our country’s name, Taiwan.
They do not call it “Chinese Taipei,” “Chinese Taiwan” or “Taiwan, China.” Even the name “Republic of China” is on its way out.
Taiwan also has its own Global Trade Item Number, which is a unique number used to identify trade items and is an indicator of an exported product’s origin.
“Made in Taiwan” is a branding that has global recognition as a marker of products made with superior quality, safety and reliability.
This has also been present in the stances of our presidents: former president Lee Teng-hui’s (李登輝) “special state-to-state international relations,” former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) “one country on each side [of the Taiwan Strait]” and President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) “neither the Republic of China [Taiwan] nor the People’s Republic of China [China] are subservient to the other.”
Tsai’s administration marks 77 years of Taiwan being its own entity and with the changes over the past 36 years, the country’s diversity, governance, economy and cultural development have undeniably made it distinct and separate from China.
During the commemoration service for the 228 Incident, Taiwan Nation Alliance (台灣國家聯盟) convener Wu Shu-min (吳樹民) said that he hopes Vice President William Lai (賴清德) would find a suitable minister of education once he is inaugurated as president — one who promotes a curriculum of historical consciousness centered on Taiwan.
Under the guidance of the president-elect, Taiwanese national consciousness would continue to be promoted, ushering Taiwan toward the normalization of the nation, Wu said.
Chen Chiao-chicy is a psychiatrist at Mackay Memorial Hospital and an adjunct professor.
Translated by Tim Smith
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS