Faced with the threat of an invasion from China, Taiwan must improve its military preparedness, which includes increasing its defense budget. These are things that belong to the realm of “hard power.”
Beijing and Taipei are grappling for control over a long story arc to persuade the international community — on official and civic levels — of the truth about Taiwan’s sovereignty status. “Soft power” is an indispensable way of achieving this, and it is being used by both sides.
Senior lecturer M. Syaprin Zahidi writes, in an article published on this page, of the Taiwan-Indonesian context and of the importance of public diplomacy in extending Taiwan’s outreach to that country.
Whereas the Indonesian government currently observes the “one China” policy, the general public is divided on its perceptions of Taiwan and Chinese Communist Party’s claims over it, Zahidi says, adding that these perceptions are largely shaped by the public diplomacy being carried out by their governments: Taipei’s New Southbound Policy (NSP) and Beijing’s Confucian Institute and student exchange programs.
The government also has a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to facilitate the employment of Indian workers in Taiwan. While this is primarily aimed at addressing labor shortages, it also has implications for soft power outreach, as it will help Taiwanese broaden their understanding of the Indian culture and vice versa. This will, in turn, set the scene for a deepening of ties between Taipei and New Delhi. The MOU is designed to work on multiple levels, enhancing exchanges at the civil and official levels, and fostering India’s investment in Taiwan’s economic and political stability. It can be seen as an extension of the government’s NSP, to transcend the constraints on international participation at the official level by raising Taiwan’s profile among the Indian populace. However, it met a stumbling block soon after its signing, with discriminatory outbursts being posted on Taiwanese social media platforms.
These inflammatory and derogatory posts about Indian workers were “misleading and harmed Taiwan’s international image,” the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said. It put the comments down to cognitive warfare tactics aimed at tarnishing Taiwan’s image as a multiethnic country that respects human rights.
It was unfortunate that Minister of Labor Hsu Ming-chun (許銘春) on Monday made clumsy, culturally insensitive comments in an interview, suggesting that the government had selected Indian workers from the northeastern part of the country as “their skin color and dietary habits are closer to ours.”
Uma Chinnannan, a doctoral candidate from India currently studying at National Chengchi University, writes in an article also published on this page that Hsu’s comments, although meant to ease integration, actually highlighted the challenges of fostering cultural compatibility without perpetuating stereotypes.
She writes that her experiences while living in Taiwan have been overwhelmingly positive, but adds that the government needs to provide comprehensive education and must be proactive in promoting integration and cultural understanding.
Meanwhile, Japan is bolstering its shrinking workforce with foreign workers and is introducing supportive measures, from changes to the working environment to language education and life counseling. It wants to encourage foreigners to work in Japan and help them integrate into Japanese society.
Taiwan has an even more pressing need to ensure that the integration of foreign nationals succeeds. The government clearly recognizes the importance of soft power, given initiatives such as the NSP and the MOU on Indian migrant workers. It should take a leaf out of Japan’s book and ensure that the correct policies are in place to promote integration. It should also make sure that its own ministers are briefed on the importance and intricacies of cultural sensitivity.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS