As a substitute teacher in her mid-20s, Lindsey Puls was delighted to discover the fashion world of Shein more than 10 years ago, lured in by its super-low prices — with tops selling for a few US dollars, dresses under US$10 and free shipping on orders more than US$29.
Puls, who has a blog called Have Clothes, Will Travel, joined other influencers in modeling her low-priced but trendy purchases on social media like Instagram and TikTok, contributing to a surge in popularity for Shein. The company, which was founded in China and sells clothing manufactured there, is now the top fast fashion retailer in the US.
“From my experience, they have pretty good designs for the price and extensive varieties,” said Puls, who lives in Shiocton, Wisconsin. “The US is in this phase where ‘more is better.’ Many people want to get as much clothing as money can buy.”
TRADE EXCEPTION
How can stylish imports from the other side of the Pacific be so cheap? The answer has much to do with a trade rule known as the de minimis exception, which allows parcels valued under US$800 to enter the US duty-free per person per day.
ONLINE SHOPPING
With the explosion of global online shopping, that rule is now coming under scrutiny. While the US’ Gen Z shoppers might celebrate their online bargains, lawmakers from both parties are questioning whether the rule allows manufacturers to avoid tariffs aimed at protecting US companies and bypass laws barring the imports of products made by forced labor, illicit drugs or unsafe materials.
On Thursday, a group of 40 US lawmakers asked US Homeland Security Secretary Alexander Mayorkas to crack down on the de minimis trade, which they said also facilitates the flow of deadly drugs like fentanyl into the US.
LAWMAKER INTEREST
US Representative Earl Blumenauer, top Democrat on the House Ways and Means trade subcommittee, has introduced legislation to exclude non-market economies like China from the rule. A bill introduced in the Senate would make the practice reciprocal. China, for example, sets the de minimis threshold at about US$7.
“The de minimis loophole is a threat to US competitiveness, consumer safety and basic human rights,” Blumenauer said in December last year.
But the de minimis rule also has powerful defenders. The US National Foreign Trade Council, whose members include major shippers such as FedEx, UPS and DHL as well as online retailers like Amazon and eBay, said that restricting its use would make purchases more expensive for US consumers and small businesses. The cost of a US$50 package would double, the council said.
Shein, now based in Singapore, said in a statement that it has made it a priority to comply with the customs and import laws of the countries where it operates, including the US requirements for de minimis packages.
ORIGINS
Introduced in 1938, the de minimis exception was intended to facilitate the flow of small packages valued at no more than US$5, the equivalent of about US$106 today. The threshold increased to US$200 in 1994 and US$800 in 2016. At the time, US Senator John Thune, a South Dakota Republican, said the bill would “empower more Americans to engage in global commerce.”
ONE BILLION
Last year, for the first time, more than one billion de minimis packages came through US customs, up from 134 million packages in 2015. China is the biggest source of retail packages entering the US, accounting for the bulk of the nearly 3 million small parcels that come through every day under the de minimis rule, US Customs and Border Protection data showed.
“That’s approximately a 646 percent increase over just eight years,” said LaFonda Sutton-Burke, director of field operations for Custom and Border Protection’s Chicago field office, which oversees one of the nation’s busiest ports for de minimis parcels. Behind the surge is the explosive growth in e-commerce, she said.
A report last year by the US House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party found that Shein and Temu, a low-cost online retailer of clothing and household goods, alone accounted for more than 30 percent of all packages shipped to the US daily under the de minimis exemption.
EXPORTS
China’s exports grew only 0.6 percent last year, but the bright spot was cross-border e-commerce, which includes but is not limited to the de minimis packages. These online sales expanded nearly 20 percent last year to reach 1.83 trillion yuan (US$257 billion) nearly 8 percent of the country’s total exports. The US is the biggest market, accounting for more than one-third of Chinese goods bought online and shipped internationally in 2022, the last year for which China’s official customs data are available.
The US does not include these direct online retail sales in its import figures, so it is difficult to know the true US dollar value of the de minimis parcels.
Coalition for a Prosperous America trade counsel Charles Benoit said about US$188 billion worth came into the US from other countries in 2022.
A repeal of the provision could add US$20 to US$30 to each transaction, which would make it financially impossible for businesses such as Shein and Temu to sell to US consumers at the low prices they are offering now, Benoit said.
UNFAIR TRADE
In a January meeting with Mayorkas, the US National Council of Textile Organizations complained about unfair trade practices, including the de minimis rule.
“The industry has lost eight plants in three months,” the council said. “Plants that survived the Great Depression, the Great Recession and COVID aren’t surviving the economic environment due to demand destruction exacerbated by unfair trade practices.” It called for better enforcement of laws forbidding the import of goods produced by forced labor and the closing of the de minimis loophole, which it said “is facilitating millions of unchecked packages a day into our market and hurting our industry.”
Law enforcement agencies also complain about the de minimis provision, which they say has helped fuel the drug crisis.
The US National Association of Police Organizations testified in December last year before the House Ways and Means trade subcommittee that much of the fentanyl seized last year came into the country in de minimis packages. It is unclear how much fentanyl and other illicit drugs might be slipping undetected into the country in small packages.
On a recent Friday morning at Chicago’s O’Hare airport, small parcels that had arrived by mail from overseas were on conveyor belts going through X-ray machines for inspection. Officers occasionally stopped the belt to pick out and open a suspicious parcel. Among the items they seized were replica guns and illicit drugs.
Sutton-Burke said US Customs and Border Protection uses a “layered security approach” and works with multiple partners to manage shipments, but resources have “literally remained static” in the face of the explosive growth of de minimis parcels.
Investments in infrastructure and technology would be helpful, she said, as would updating US rules and laws to allow the agency to obtain more information about the small parcels coming in to help customs agents identify high-risk shipments.
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS