As a substitute teacher in her mid-20s, Lindsey Puls was delighted to discover the fashion world of Shein more than 10 years ago, lured in by its super-low prices — with tops selling for a few US dollars, dresses under US$10 and free shipping on orders more than US$29.
Puls, who has a blog called Have Clothes, Will Travel, joined other influencers in modeling her low-priced but trendy purchases on social media like Instagram and TikTok, contributing to a surge in popularity for Shein. The company, which was founded in China and sells clothing manufactured there, is now the top fast fashion retailer in the US.
“From my experience, they have pretty good designs for the price and extensive varieties,” said Puls, who lives in Shiocton, Wisconsin. “The US is in this phase where ‘more is better.’ Many people want to get as much clothing as money can buy.”
TRADE EXCEPTION
How can stylish imports from the other side of the Pacific be so cheap? The answer has much to do with a trade rule known as the de minimis exception, which allows parcels valued under US$800 to enter the US duty-free per person per day.
ONLINE SHOPPING
With the explosion of global online shopping, that rule is now coming under scrutiny. While the US’ Gen Z shoppers might celebrate their online bargains, lawmakers from both parties are questioning whether the rule allows manufacturers to avoid tariffs aimed at protecting US companies and bypass laws barring the imports of products made by forced labor, illicit drugs or unsafe materials.
On Thursday, a group of 40 US lawmakers asked US Homeland Security Secretary Alexander Mayorkas to crack down on the de minimis trade, which they said also facilitates the flow of deadly drugs like fentanyl into the US.
LAWMAKER INTEREST
US Representative Earl Blumenauer, top Democrat on the House Ways and Means trade subcommittee, has introduced legislation to exclude non-market economies like China from the rule. A bill introduced in the Senate would make the practice reciprocal. China, for example, sets the de minimis threshold at about US$7.
“The de minimis loophole is a threat to US competitiveness, consumer safety and basic human rights,” Blumenauer said in December last year.
But the de minimis rule also has powerful defenders. The US National Foreign Trade Council, whose members include major shippers such as FedEx, UPS and DHL as well as online retailers like Amazon and eBay, said that restricting its use would make purchases more expensive for US consumers and small businesses. The cost of a US$50 package would double, the council said.
Shein, now based in Singapore, said in a statement that it has made it a priority to comply with the customs and import laws of the countries where it operates, including the US requirements for de minimis packages.
ORIGINS
Introduced in 1938, the de minimis exception was intended to facilitate the flow of small packages valued at no more than US$5, the equivalent of about US$106 today. The threshold increased to US$200 in 1994 and US$800 in 2016. At the time, US Senator John Thune, a South Dakota Republican, said the bill would “empower more Americans to engage in global commerce.”
ONE BILLION
Last year, for the first time, more than one billion de minimis packages came through US customs, up from 134 million packages in 2015. China is the biggest source of retail packages entering the US, accounting for the bulk of the nearly 3 million small parcels that come through every day under the de minimis rule, US Customs and Border Protection data showed.
“That’s approximately a 646 percent increase over just eight years,” said LaFonda Sutton-Burke, director of field operations for Custom and Border Protection’s Chicago field office, which oversees one of the nation’s busiest ports for de minimis parcels. Behind the surge is the explosive growth in e-commerce, she said.
A report last year by the US House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party found that Shein and Temu, a low-cost online retailer of clothing and household goods, alone accounted for more than 30 percent of all packages shipped to the US daily under the de minimis exemption.
EXPORTS
China’s exports grew only 0.6 percent last year, but the bright spot was cross-border e-commerce, which includes but is not limited to the de minimis packages. These online sales expanded nearly 20 percent last year to reach 1.83 trillion yuan (US$257 billion) nearly 8 percent of the country’s total exports. The US is the biggest market, accounting for more than one-third of Chinese goods bought online and shipped internationally in 2022, the last year for which China’s official customs data are available.
The US does not include these direct online retail sales in its import figures, so it is difficult to know the true US dollar value of the de minimis parcels.
Coalition for a Prosperous America trade counsel Charles Benoit said about US$188 billion worth came into the US from other countries in 2022.
A repeal of the provision could add US$20 to US$30 to each transaction, which would make it financially impossible for businesses such as Shein and Temu to sell to US consumers at the low prices they are offering now, Benoit said.
UNFAIR TRADE
In a January meeting with Mayorkas, the US National Council of Textile Organizations complained about unfair trade practices, including the de minimis rule.
“The industry has lost eight plants in three months,” the council said. “Plants that survived the Great Depression, the Great Recession and COVID aren’t surviving the economic environment due to demand destruction exacerbated by unfair trade practices.” It called for better enforcement of laws forbidding the import of goods produced by forced labor and the closing of the de minimis loophole, which it said “is facilitating millions of unchecked packages a day into our market and hurting our industry.”
Law enforcement agencies also complain about the de minimis provision, which they say has helped fuel the drug crisis.
The US National Association of Police Organizations testified in December last year before the House Ways and Means trade subcommittee that much of the fentanyl seized last year came into the country in de minimis packages. It is unclear how much fentanyl and other illicit drugs might be slipping undetected into the country in small packages.
On a recent Friday morning at Chicago’s O’Hare airport, small parcels that had arrived by mail from overseas were on conveyor belts going through X-ray machines for inspection. Officers occasionally stopped the belt to pick out and open a suspicious parcel. Among the items they seized were replica guns and illicit drugs.
Sutton-Burke said US Customs and Border Protection uses a “layered security approach” and works with multiple partners to manage shipments, but resources have “literally remained static” in the face of the explosive growth of de minimis parcels.
Investments in infrastructure and technology would be helpful, she said, as would updating US rules and laws to allow the agency to obtain more information about the small parcels coming in to help customs agents identify high-risk shipments.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS