An increasing number of Taiwanese feel that maintaining the cross-strait “status quo” would be difficult in the future and fear that Taiwan would be forced into unification with China, results of a survey showed on Monday.
A vast majority of Taiwanese wish to keep the “status quo,” but do not think it would be possible to do so forever, the Central News Agency said, citing Academia Sinica researcher Wu Jieh-min (吳介民).
The survey asked the public about their predictions regarding the future of cross-strait relations, but the options — whether Taiwan should be independent or maintain the “status quo” — obfuscate the issue.
Taiwan already has de facto independence. It could achieve de jure independence by amending its Constitution to rescind historical claims over territories internationally recognized as China’s. The more China pressures Taiwan, the more it drives Taiwanese away from embracing unification, and could even push them towards seeking de jure independence.
With de jure independence, Taiwan could even keep using “Republic of China” as its official name. Even if Beijing refutes the existence of “two Chinas,” it would be powerless to stop an independent country from using whatever name it chooses.
It is concerning that there are Taiwanese who have a “unification with China is inevitable” mindset, given that this scenario is at odds with public sentiment. If a majority of citizens genuinely desire to maintain independence from China and believe that Taiwan’s independence is at threat, then it is imperative that military reforms be made and conscription training improved.
The issue of de jure independence should also eventually be put to a referendum, so that Taiwanese could decide their future for themselves.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) would likely obstruct this or block the Constitutional amendment if the referendum passes. However, Taiwan — a representative democracy — has made strides toward direct democracy in recent years, so the KMT might one day be powerless to impede the progress of a Constitutional amendment.
China would likely threaten the nation if it amended its Constitution to remove outdated territorial claims, but Taiwan would not be a true democracy if it refrained from making political decisions simply because another country’s leader thinks it is “unacceptable.” Nevertheless, Taiwan must have contingency plans to protect itself before marching into such a reform.
Aside from military planning, Taiwan would likely want to discuss such plans with the US, Japan and Europe, and encourage them to be vocal about the consequences China would face if it attempted to annex Taiwan.
Even without plans for such a referendum, Taiwan must be ready for a potential military conflict with China.
This means refusing unification as an inevitability and instead being prepared to defend the nation’s sovereignty and the way of life of its people.
If the public is unwilling to accept unification, but still sees it as inevitable, then the government has failed to instill confidence in the nation’s preparedness and military capabilities.
The question of whether the US, Japan or other countries would come to Taiwan’s aid in the event of a war in the Taiwan Strait is often raised.
One thing could be said with certainty: Help would only come to those who help themselves. The survey results make it clear that the government has to prioritize military training and improve the military’s public image.
If Taiwanese have confidence in the military’s ability to defend the nation, they would be more likely to resist Chinese aggression and that would, in turn, act as a deterrent to China.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS