An increasing number of Taiwanese feel that maintaining the cross-strait “status quo” would be difficult in the future and fear that Taiwan would be forced into unification with China, results of a survey showed on Monday.
A vast majority of Taiwanese wish to keep the “status quo,” but do not think it would be possible to do so forever, the Central News Agency said, citing Academia Sinica researcher Wu Jieh-min (吳介民).
The survey asked the public about their predictions regarding the future of cross-strait relations, but the options — whether Taiwan should be independent or maintain the “status quo” — obfuscate the issue.
Taiwan already has de facto independence. It could achieve de jure independence by amending its Constitution to rescind historical claims over territories internationally recognized as China’s. The more China pressures Taiwan, the more it drives Taiwanese away from embracing unification, and could even push them towards seeking de jure independence.
With de jure independence, Taiwan could even keep using “Republic of China” as its official name. Even if Beijing refutes the existence of “two Chinas,” it would be powerless to stop an independent country from using whatever name it chooses.
It is concerning that there are Taiwanese who have a “unification with China is inevitable” mindset, given that this scenario is at odds with public sentiment. If a majority of citizens genuinely desire to maintain independence from China and believe that Taiwan’s independence is at threat, then it is imperative that military reforms be made and conscription training improved.
The issue of de jure independence should also eventually be put to a referendum, so that Taiwanese could decide their future for themselves.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) would likely obstruct this or block the Constitutional amendment if the referendum passes. However, Taiwan — a representative democracy — has made strides toward direct democracy in recent years, so the KMT might one day be powerless to impede the progress of a Constitutional amendment.
China would likely threaten the nation if it amended its Constitution to remove outdated territorial claims, but Taiwan would not be a true democracy if it refrained from making political decisions simply because another country’s leader thinks it is “unacceptable.” Nevertheless, Taiwan must have contingency plans to protect itself before marching into such a reform.
Aside from military planning, Taiwan would likely want to discuss such plans with the US, Japan and Europe, and encourage them to be vocal about the consequences China would face if it attempted to annex Taiwan.
Even without plans for such a referendum, Taiwan must be ready for a potential military conflict with China.
This means refusing unification as an inevitability and instead being prepared to defend the nation’s sovereignty and the way of life of its people.
If the public is unwilling to accept unification, but still sees it as inevitable, then the government has failed to instill confidence in the nation’s preparedness and military capabilities.
The question of whether the US, Japan or other countries would come to Taiwan’s aid in the event of a war in the Taiwan Strait is often raised.
One thing could be said with certainty: Help would only come to those who help themselves. The survey results make it clear that the government has to prioritize military training and improve the military’s public image.
If Taiwanese have confidence in the military’s ability to defend the nation, they would be more likely to resist Chinese aggression and that would, in turn, act as a deterrent to China.
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS